ESAs published joint draft regulatory technical standards to amend the Delegated Regulation on the risk mitigation techniques for non-cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives (bilateral margining) as well as a joint statement on the introduction of fallbacks in OTC derivative contracts and the requirement to exchange collateral. The regulatory technical standards and the statement were developed to facilitate further international consistency in the implementation of the global framework agreed by BCBS and IOSCO. ESAs have developed these regulatory standards under Article 11(15) of European Market Infrastructure Regulation or EMIR (EU No 648/2012).
In view of the clarifications and changes of the global framework made over the past months by BCBS and IOSCO, the report and related regulatory standards clarify the expectations in relation to the threshold above which initial margin is expected to be exchanged and introduce a further phase-in of one year for smaller counterparties in scope for the initial margin requirements. Taking into account the global progress toward implementation of the international framework as well as the risks that BCBS and IOSCO framework was developed to address, a few amendments have been included in relation to the treatment of physically settled foreign-exchange forward and swap contracts, intragroup contracts, and equity option contracts.
The statement by ESAs clarifies the view of ESAs that amendments made to outstanding uncleared OTC derivative contracts for the sole purpose of introducing such fallbacks should not create new obligations on these legacy contracts. With regard to the statement in relation to fallbacks, ESAs believe it useful to ensure legal certainty on this issue, in case or to the extent this is not already provided in some jurisdictions. ESAs are mindful of the efforts that counterparties continue to undertake to introduce fallbacks in their legacy OTC derivative contracts across all asset classes. Therefore, while further legal certainty is expected on this via a legislative change, ESAs do not expect competent authorities to
- Prioritize their supervisory actions toward margining requirements arising as a result of the introduction of fallbacks in legacy uncleared OTC derivative contracts
- Generally apply their risk-based supervisory powers in their day-to-day enforcement of applicable legislation in this area in a proportionate manner
ESAs are submitting the draft technical standards, presented in the Annex to final report, to EC for endorsement in the form of a Commission Delegated Regulation. Following the endorsement, they will then be subject to non-objection by the European Parliament and the Council. Post that, the Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Bilateral Margin Requirements, Regulatory Technical Standards, OTC Derivatives, Fallback, EMIR, ESAs, BCBS, IOSCO
Previous ArticleFASB Publishes Summary of Emerging Issues Task Force Meeting
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.