ISDA has submitted a letter to the Official Sector Steering Group (FSB OSSG) of FSB on the pre-cessation triggers for derivative fallbacks. The communication is in response to a letter sent by the FSB OSSG to ISDA in November 2019. ISDA recognizes the importance of both scenarios outlined by FSB OSSG—the permanent cessation of a key Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) and a determination by the UK FCA that LIBOR is no longer representative of the underlying market but continues to be published. ISDA remains fully focused on the timely delivery of a fallback solution to prevent the systemic disruption that could occur if LIBOR or another key IBOR ceases.
As the work on permanent cessation fallbacks will be finalized, ISDA will simultaneously work with regulators and the industry to increase market understanding of the implications of a “non-representative” LIBOR and will attempt to build a consensus on how to implement the pre-cessation fallbacks, in line with the FSB OSSG’s request. To further increase market understanding, ISDA believes it is critical that market participants also receive further clarity on the following:
- A statement from UK FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration that the “reasonable period” during which a “non-representative” LIBOR would be published would be minimal after FCA announces that LIBOR is no longer representative.
- A public and definitive confirmation directly from the central counterparties (CCPs) clearing LIBOR derivatives or their regulatory supervisor.
In light of the feedback received in the pre-cessation consultation, the strategy described in the November 2019 letter would require ISDA to re-consult with the market on a single documentation approach and engage with relevant competition authorities. ISDA highlighted that it is prepared to do so once the market has the benefit of appropriate clarity on the issues described above. If a strong majority of market participants supports a “non-representativeness” pre-cessation fallback trigger for LIBOR derivatives in response to the consultation, then ISDA would work to implement pre-cessation fallbacks—either along with the documentation for permanent cessation fallbacks or as a second step to complement the permanent cessation fallbacks. In any event, ISDA will offer standard language for a “non-representativeness” pre-cessation fallback trigger that market participants could use.
ISDA is on track to finalize the substantive portion of its work to develop permanent cessation fallbacks by the end of 2019 and to facilitate implementation during the first half of 2020. On November 15, 2019, ISDA released the results of a third successful industry consultation on the adjustment methodologies for permanent cessation fallbacks rates. ISDA will shortly issue a brief supplemental consultation to confirm the suitability of these adjustments for fallbacks in derivatives referencing euro LIBOR and EURIBOR. On completion of this consultation in the first quarter of 2020, ISDA will publish the Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions containing the fallbacks and will open, for adherence, a protocol to include these fallbacks in existing derivatives. The amendments to new and existing derivatives contracts will take effect approximately three months later, in the second quarter of 2020. Based on feedback and support from market participants, ISDA believes that the new documentation will provide a critical backstop in contracts that continue to reference LIBOR or another key IBOR if and when that IBOR ceases.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, IBOR, Pre-cessation Triggers, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Fallback, FCA, FSB, ISDA
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).