EC published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union on the interpretation of certain legal provisions of the revised bank resolution framework. The notice is in response to questions raised by the authorities of member states in the context of the resolution framework for banks. In this notice, EC adopts answers related to legal acts, including the revised Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD2) and Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (SRMR2). This notice complements the notice adopted by EC, in September 2020, with the answers to the questions raised by authorities of member states on the interpretation of certain legal provisions of BRRD 2 and its interactions with SRMR and the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation.
The notice addresses questions on the following topics:
- Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities
- Contractual recognition of bail-in
- Write-down or conversion of capital instruments and eligible liabilities
- Contractual recognition of resolution stay powers
- Selling of subordinated eligible liabilities to retail clients
- Power to prohibit certain distributions provided in Article 16A BRRD
- Resolution planning
- Insolvency proceedings in respect of institutions and entities that are not subject to resolution action
- Powers to suspend payment or delivery obligations under Articles 33A and 69
The banking reform package includes changes to the bank resolution framework through BRRD2 and SRMR2. Member states must transpose the provisions of BRRD2 into their national law by December 28, 2020. This notice clarifies the provisions already contained in the applicable legislation. It does not extend in any way the rights and obligations deriving from such legislation nor introduce any additional requirements of the concerned operators and competent authorities. The notice is intended to assist authorities of member states in the transposition of EU legislation into national law and in the implementation of relevant legal provisions.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, BRRD2, CRR2, SRMR2, CRD5, Resolution Framework, Q&A, Basel, Regulatory Capital, EC
Previous ArticleEBA Revises Guidelines on Legislative and Non-Legislative Moratoria
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.