APRA to Improve Individual Disability Income Insurance Sustainability
APRA has decided to impose an upfront capital requirement on all individual disability income insurance providers, effective from March 31, 2020. In a letter to industry, APRA announced a series of measures (detailed in an attachment to the letter) that will require life insurers and friendly societies to address flaws in product design and pricing and include a Pillar 2 capital charge (communicated to affected companies in December 2019) for insurers and reinsurers. For some of these measures, APRA is seeking feedback on specific design details by February 29, 2020 and it will finalize and communicate its position on these details by June 30, 2020. APRA will also introduce an individual disability income insurance data collection, which is due to be released mid-next year and will help APRA to monitor life companies’ progress in meeting its expectations.
This intervention into the life insurance market is in response to the ongoing heavy losses in respect of individual disability income insurance. By introducing this package of measures, APRA is forcing the industry to better manage the risks associated with disability income insurance and to address unsustainable product design features—or face additional financial penalties. To underline the urgency of the situation, this decision to impose an upfront capital requirement on all individual disability income insurance providers has been taken. The capital requirement will remain in place until individual insurers can demonstrate they have taken adequate and timely steps to address the sustainability concerns of APRA.
In instances where individual insurers continue to fail to meet APRA expectations, APRA may also issue directions or make changes to license conditions. APRA also expects life companies to better manage riskier product features, including by:
- Ensuring that the disability income insurance benefits do not exceed the policyholder’s income at the time of claim and ceasing the sale of Agreed Value policies
- Avoiding offering the disability income insurance policies with fixed terms and conditions of more than five years
- Ensuring effective controls are in place to manage the risks associated with longer benefit periods
Life insurance companies have collectively lost nearly $3.4 billion over the past five years through the sale of disability income insurance to individuals (rather than through superannuation). APRA had written to the industry in May requesting urgent action to address the problems. Since then, insurers have reported further losses of $1 billion, prompting APRA to escalate its response. With at least one major reinsurer indicating it was no longer prepared to reinsure individual disability income insurance, APRA Executive Board Member Geoff Summerhayes said there is now a genuine risk insurers may start withdrawing from the market.
Related Links
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Insurance, Life Insurers, Reinsurers, Individuality Disability Income Insurance, Pillar 2, Capital Requirement, Regulatory Capital, Data Collection, APRA
Featured Experts
Trevor Howes
IFRS 17 technical advisor; AXIS actuarial modeling system expert; extensive experience in life insurance and life reinsurance, with focus on modeling, valuation, and financial reporting
Nick Jessop
Scenario modeling expert; risk management specialist; quantitative financial modeler
Pierre Xu
Quantitative researcher; portfolio management expert
Previous Article
BoE Publishes Draft of Version 1.1.0 of Form AS/FV TaxonomyRelated Articles
EBA Updates List of Validation Rules for Reporting by Banks
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA Responds to EC Call for Advice to Strengthen AML/CFT Framework
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS Advocates Environmental Risk Analysis for Financial Sector
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS Issues Guidelines to Promote Senior Management Accountability
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA Formalizes Capital Treatment and Reporting of COVID-19 Loans
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB Chair Discusses Path to Harmonized Liquidation Regime for Banks
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB Workshop Discusses Preliminary Findings of Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB Updates List of Supervised Entities in EU in September 2020
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI Identifies Focus Areas to Strengthen Third-Party Risk Management
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Framework on SFTs
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.
