ECB published an occasional paper that describes stablecoins and assesses to what extent they can maintain a stable value, without entering into the discussion about the potential macroeconomic impact from either a financial stability or monetary policy perspective. The paper provides an overview and taxonomy of the stablecoin. It analyzes the trade-off between innovation and the volatility of different types of stablecoins and their possible role in the crypto-asset market and beyond.
This paper describes the often complex functioning of different types of stablecoins and proposes a taxonomy of stablecoin initiatives. To this end, it relies on a novel framework for their classification, based on the three key dimensions that matter for crypto-assets: accountability of issuer, decentralization of responsibilities, and what underpins the value of the asset. The analysis of different types of stablecoins shows a trade-off between the novelty of the stabilization mechanism used in an initiative and its capacity to maintain a stable market value. The analysis in this paper shows that the relationship between the innovation of a particular type of stablecoin and its capacity to limit price volatility expressed in a currency of reference is strong and these two characteristics are inversely related. While less innovative stablecoins could provide a solution for users seeking a stable store of value, especially if legitimized by adherence to the standards typical of traditional businesses, the jury is still out on the role that more innovative but volatile stablecoin types may play in the future.
The paper states that some on-chain collateralized stablecoins have proven they can withstand large fluctuations of underlying collateral, but it is unclear whether this is due to effective stabilization mechanisms or to the stickiness of users driven by a strong interest in protecting their privacy and/or remaining outside the financial system. Finally, the paper concludes that algorithmic stablecoins are still a theoretical alternative rather than a practical solution. Their development warrants close observation as they may give rise to renewed debates in the academic and central bank communities. Uncertainties concerning the governance and regulatory treatment of stablecoin initiatives exist. An uptake in the usage of stablecoins may require improvements to the governance of such initiatives, including procedures to update the smart contracts at the core of the initiative and a cyber-security framework. However, stablecoin initiatives with a clear governance framework may nevertheless be hampered by the uncertainty relating to the lack of regulatory scrutiny and recognition. This is especially relevant, given that financial institutions could use the same technology for the recording of traditional assets and make stablecoins redundant in the use of distributed ledger technology outside crypto-asset markets.
Related Link: Occasional Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Crypto Assets, Stablecoins, Financial Stability, Research, Distributed Ledger Technology, ECB
Previous ArticleBaFin on Classification of Capital Instruments as CET 1 Instruments
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.