IASB has finalized its response to the ongoing reform of inter-bank offered rates (IBOR) and other interest rate benchmarks by issuing a package of amendments to IFRS standards. The amendments relate to standards on IFRS 9 Financial Instruments; IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement; IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures; IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts, and IFRS 16 Leases. These amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 01, 2021, with early adoption permitted. IASB also published proposals to update the IFRS taxonomy to reflect the disclosure requirements included in the amendments, with the comment period on the proposal ending on September 28, 2020.
The amendments are aimed at helping companies to provide investors with useful information about the effects of the reform on those companies’ financial statements. The amendments complement those issued in 2019 and focus on the effects on financial statements when a company replaces the old interest rate benchmark with an alternative benchmark rate as a result of the reform. The amendments in this final phase relate to:
- Changes to contractual cash flows—A company will not have to de-recognize or adjust the carrying amount of financial instruments for changes required by the reform, but will instead update the effective interest rate to reflect the change to the alternative benchmark rate
- Hedge accounting—A company will not have to discontinue its hedge accounting solely because it makes changes required by the reform, if the hedge meets other hedge accounting criteria
- Disclosures—A company will be required to disclose information about new risks arising from the reform and how it manages the transition to alternative benchmark rates
In September 2019, IASB had amended IFRS 9, IAS 39, and IFRS 7 to address, as a priority, issues affecting financial reporting in the period before the reform of an interest rate benchmark, including the replacement of an interest rate benchmark with an alternative benchmark rate (Phase 1 amendments). After issuing the Phase 1 amendments, IASB commenced Phase 2 of its project. Now, in August 2020, IASB has issued further amendments to IFRS standards, concluding its work in response to the reform. The Phase 2 amendments address issues that might affect financial reporting during the reform of an interest rate benchmark, including the effects of changes to contractual cash flows or hedging relationships arising from the replacement of an interest rate benchmark with an alternative benchmark rate (replacement issues).
Keywords: International, Accounting, Banking, Insurance, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Benchmark Reforms, IBOR, Phase 2, IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, IFRS 4, Insurance Contracts, IASB
Previous ArticleFSI Paper Discusses Regulatory Framework for Digital Banks
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
MAS published amendments to Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements for reporting banks incorporated in Singapore.
FCA announced that it will move firms to RegData from Gabriel in the coming months in stages, based on the reporting requirements of firms.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.