FCA published for consultation the updated guidance for firms in relation to mortgage payment deferrals, with comment period on the draft guidance ending on September 01, 2020. The draft guidance explains that, at the end of the existing, widely available COVID-19-specific payment deferrals, if the borrowers involved are not able to resume payments in full immediately with all deferred sums either paid in full or capitalized, tailored forbearance arrangements provided in accordance with the draft updated guidance should be considered. Such tailored forbearance arrangements are likely to be as good an indicator of significant increase in credit risk, credit impairments, or defaults as forbearance was prior to the pandemic. PRA also issued a statement that clarifies its approach to IFRS 9 and capital requirements, in response to the updated FCA guidance on retail mortgage payment deferrals.
The FCA guidance proposes that firms should consider the appropriateness, and use, of a range of different short- and long-term support options to reflect the specific circumstances of their customers. This could include extending the repayment term or restructuring the mortgage. Where consumers need further short-term support, firms should offer arrangements for no or reduced payments for a specified period to give customers the time to get back on track. Under the proposed guidance, firms should prioritize giving tailored support to borrowers who are at most risk of harm, or who face the greatest financial difficulties. Firms should also provide borrowers with the support they need in managing their finances, including through self-help and money guidance, and refer borrowers to debt advice if this meets their needs and circumstances. Where borrowers require further support from lenders, either at the end of payment holidays under the FCA guidance or where they are in need of support for the first time, this would be reflected on credit files in accordance with the normal reporting processes. This will help to ensure that lenders have an accurate picture of consumers’ financial circumstances and reduce the risk of unaffordable lending. Firms should be clear about the credit file implications of any forms of support offered to borrowers.
In its statement, PRA sets out that, prior to COVID-19, loans subject to forbearance would not automatically have been treated as having experienced a significant increase in credit risk, or become credit impaired or in default, and that will also be the case with tailored forbearance provided in accordance with the draft updated guidance. While in some cases the position will be clear-cut, in other cases a judgment will need to be made. The guidance in the PRA’s June letter on a framework for making holistic assessments of loans subject to payment deferrals for indicators of significant increase in credit risk or credit impairment will be relevant when making that judgment. Additionally, the guidance in the March letter of PRA on the treatment of borrowers that breach covenants due to COVID-19, on IFRS 9 expected credit loss (ECL) model risk, and on the need for post-core ECL model adjustments continues to be relevant. PRA considers the guidance in its statement to be consistent with IFRS and the EU Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). However, it is the responsibility of firms to satisfy themselves that they have prepared their annual and interim financial reports in accordance with the applicable reporting frameworks and for auditors to reach their own audit or review conclusions about those reports. Similarly, it is for firms to ensure that they comply with the requirements of CRR.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, COVID-19, Payment Deferrals, CRR, IFRS 9, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Credit Risk, SICR, ECL, PRA, FCA
Previous ArticleBundesbank Publishes Guidelines for AnaCredit Reporting
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.