ECB published its opinion (CON/2018/36) on the review of prudential treatment of investment firms. In January 2018, ECB had received requests from the European Parliament and the Council of the EU, respectively, for an opinion on a proposal for a Regulation on the prudential requirements of investment firms and amending Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (No 575/2013), Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation or MiFIR (No 600/2014), and EU Regulation No 1093/2010 (regulation establishing EBA), along with a proposal for a Directive on the prudential supervision of investment firms and amending the fourth Capital Requirements Directive or CRD IV (Directive 2013/36/EU) and Markets in Financial Instruments Directive or MiFID (Directive 2014/65/EU). Overall, ECB supports the objective of the proposed acts in setting out a prudential framework that is better adapted to the risks and business models of different types of investment firms.
The opinion states that ECB generally supports the purpose of subjecting systemically important investment firms to the same prudential rules as credit institutions; however, the proposed acts should be carefully assessed in order to avoid unintended consequences for other Union legal acts due to the change in the definition of credit institutions. This opinion highlights in particular certain implications for the statistics regime. However, such effects are not limited to the statistics framework. Currently, only credit institutions can be eligible counterparties for Eurosystem monetary policy operations. The possible consequences of an inclusion of Class 1 investment firms in the definition of "credit institution" will need to be carefully assessed by ECB.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, MiFID/MiFIR, CRR/CRD, Opinion, CON/2018/36, ECB
Next ArticleEBA Consults on DPM 2.9 for Supervisory Reporting
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.