EBA published phase 2 of its technical package on the reporting framework 2.9, which includes validation rules, Data Point Model (DPM) data dictionary, and XBRL taxonomies. The 2.9 “Phase 2” release covers changes in FINREP and Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolios frameworks, in addition to some hotfixes for COREP and resolution frameworks in “Phase 1” release. The update reflects the amendments to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting related to FINREP and on benchmarking of internal approaches, both of which were published on July 16, 2019.
EBA intends to publish an update to the 2.9 taxonomy in January, to add and correct validation rules. The aim would be to enhance data quality, taking into account both feedback on the 2.9 taxonomy, but also crucially practical reporting experience from the 2.9 release. Only elements of 2.9 that have not yet come into use in January would be affected (that is, excluding Resolution or Benchmarking). This change is not intended to impact any structural elements of the reporting, but only the validation rules—that is, the changes would be “instance compatible.” The amendments to the reporting framework 2.9 will apply from different reference dates due to different application dates of the underlying regulatory requirements.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Reporting, Framework 2.9, Supervisory Benchmarking, FINREP, COREP, Resolution Framework, Validation Rules, DPM 2.9, Taxonomy, EBA
Previous ArticleAPRA Publishes Details on Committed Liquidity Facility for LCR Banks
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.