Featured Product

    Bundesbank VP on Regulatory and Financial Stability Issues on Fintech

    August 20, 2019

    At a seminar on "Statistics on Fintech," Professor Claudia Buch, the Vice-President of Deutsche Bundesbank, discussed how digital innovations can be a catalyst for structural change in the financial system and can affect the risk-stability trade-off. In the context of the central bank mandate on financial stability, he outlined the key regulatory issues related to fintech and bigtech firms, highlighted the importance of surveillance of non-traditional financial institutions, and emphasized that better statistics are needed to improve surveillance. Better statistics help in addressing the "big data paradox" but the existing statistical systems provide little information for a structured surveillance of the digital innovation trends.

    Ms. Buch stated that the evolution of service provision by fintech and bigtech firms is a particularly important issue for central banks. Essentially, all business areas are affected, including financial stability, prudential supervision, payments, markets, and monetary analysis. Digital innovations and improvements in information technology have the potential to significantly change the competitive structure of banking markets. Fintech and bigtech firms potentially have comparative advantages over banks in deploying big data techniques, artificial intelligence, machine learning, or social media data for credit scoring or risk assessments. Obtaining reliable information on the activities of fintech and bigtech firms from traditional statistics and reporting systems is difficult though. Given this patchy knowledge base, it is vital to monitor the resilience of financial institutions. However, data requirements go beyond immediate central banking tasks. Data on these firms is also needed in areas such as cyber security or competition policy. Hence, there is a need to monitor new trends and this requires harmonized statistical definitions. 

    To close the data gaps, the Irving Fisher Committee (IFC) has set up a Working Group on FinTech Data Issues to take stock of the existing data sources, identify data gaps, provide guidance on fintech classification issues, and develop a way forward. In addition, IFC has conducted a membership survey in 2019, which informs about approaches that central banks pursue with regard to fintech data. The survey covered the current statistical infrastructure, "fintech gaps" in statistics, fintech data demands from a user perspective, ongoing initiatives to measure fintech, and the role of international coordination. Going forward, Ms. Buch sees four main priorities for regulators and supervisors:

    • First, improving the statistics database on providers of digital financial services is key. Better data are needed to assess risks, vulnerabilities, and resilience. Entry into the provision of financial services should be conditional on the provision of sufficient data and information that allows regulators to make the necessary assessments of risks. The recent survey by IFC shows that the statistical infrastructure is not yet geared to this new phenomenon. There is a lack of shared concepts and data. Strong cooperation on the national and the international level will thus be needed, which is one of the priorities of future work in the IFC.
    • Second, activities should be regulated irrespective of the institution offering it. This should eliminate possibilities for regulatory arbitrage so that risks are not shifted from regulated sectors toward new market participants for which these rules do not apply. Hence, regulation of new market participants should follow the principle of "same risk, same rules."
    • Third, speeding up structural change might be perceived as being excessively disruptive at the current juncture. It may be argued that testing the new resolution regimes too early could undermine the credibility of reforms. Yet, simply preserving the current market structures entails risks as well. Protecting the market shares of (large) incumbent financial institutions might counteract the reforms' objectives to address the too-big-to-fail issue. The potential for harnessing efficiency gains may be squandered.
    • Fourth, close cooperation between regulators is needed. This includes international cooperation in case innovations can have cross-border implications. However, cooperation is also needed between regulators such as competition authorities and financial regulators that have to assess and deal with relevant aspects of the same market.


    Related Link: Speech


    Keywords: International, Germany, Banking, Fintech, Bigtech, Financial Stability, Statistics, Resolution Regime, IFC, Bundesbank, BIS

    Related Articles

    BIS Report Notes Existing Gaps in Climate Risk Data at Central Banks

    A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Examines Remuneration Data and Use of Large Exposure Exemptions

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report that examines the use of certain exemptions included in the large exposures regime under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    July 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    BoE Issues Update on Ongoing Data Transformation Program

    The Bank of England (BoE) issued a communication to firms to provide an update on the progress of the joint data transformation program—which is being led by BoE, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the industry—for the financial sector in UK.

    July 21, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Issues Draft Methodology and Templates for 2023 Stress Tests

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the draft methodology, templates, and template guidance for the European Union-wide stress test in 2023.

    July 21, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Issues SREP Guidelines and Standards for Investment Firms

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) jointly published the final guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) for investment firms.

    July 21, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    BoE and PRA Publish Regulatory Updates for Financial Sector Entities

    The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) proposed expectations, via CP8/22, in respect of changes to the instruments or claims that comprise unvested deferred sums awarded to material risk-takers as part of their variable pay.

    July 19, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EIOPA Issues Taxonomy for Solvency II Reporting, Issues Other Updates

    The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.7.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.

    July 16, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    OSFI Updates Address BCAR Reporting, Basel Reforms, and Cyber Risk

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) updated the 2023 Basel Capital Adequacy Reporting (BCAR) manual as well as the 2023 BCAR return.

    July 15, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    FSB Report Outlines Progress on Climate Risk Roadmap

    In a letter to the G20 Leaders, ahead of the July 2022 meeting, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Chair set out an overview of the key work done by FSB.

    July 14, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    SRB Issues Resolvability Assessment and Bail-in Implementation Guide

    The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published its resolvability assessment and "heat map" for 2021, updated the operational guidance on implementation of bail-in tool, and issued the annual report for 2021.

    July 14, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8400