IFSB Report Assesses Stability of Islamic Financial Services Sector
The Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) issued the ninth edition of the financial stability report on the Islamic financial services sector. The report provides updates on the key trends and growth outlook and examines the resilience of the Islamic financial services industry against the COVID-19 shock, along with other vulnerability factors across the Islamic banking, capital markets, and insurance segments. The report also tracks initiatives of other international financial standard-setting bodies, with an emphasis on aspects that relate to the complementary role played by IFSB. Various IFSB initiatives have been highlighted, including a synopsis of the IFSB Standards Implementation Survey and standards development.
The financial stability report includes box-article contributions from some IFSB members such as the Central Bank of Bahrain, the Central Bank of the UAE, the Saudi Central Bank, and the State Bank of Pakistan. Other contributors are the Insurance and Private Pensions Regulation and Supervision Agency of Turkey, International Islamic Liquidity Management, and Moody's Investors Services. The article from Moody’s Investors Services summarizes the agency's views on the recent developments in Islamic Finance across the markets that Moody's covers. The article highlights that Islamic banks' financing asset growth will be moderate but still outpace conventional counterparts in 2021. To analyze the Islamic banking sector, the report utilizes data from the Prudential and Structural Islamic Financial Indicator (PSIFI) database of IFSB. The key highlights of the assessment include the following:
- The Islamic banking segment retained its dominance in the global Islamic financial services industry. The domestic market share for Islamic banking in relation to the total banking segment continued to increase in at least 23 countries, among the 36 jurisdictions covered in the report.
- The liquidity position of the Islamic banking sector in many jurisdictions tightened in the first quarter of 2020 due to the dual shock of COVID-19 and falling oil prices and production. The Islamic banking sector in most jurisdictions lacks Sharīʻah-compliant avenues for liquidity management and is prone to liquidity risk arising from the maturity transformation of converting short-term funding to long-term investments. Nonetheless, both the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio (NSFR) as measures of both short-term and medium to long-term liquidity resilience are above the 100% threshold for all but one jurisdiction, namely Bangladesh.
- The Islamic banking industry entered the COVID19-induced crises with stable capital adequacy ratios that were well above the IFSB's and its respective jurisdictions' regulatory thresholds. The average total and average Tier-1 capital adequacy ratios of the global Islamic banking industry as at the end of third quarter of 2020 were 18.3% and 16.1%, respectively. The various policy measures put in place across jurisdictions have helped to ensure that the regulatory capital ratios do not decline below the regulatory minimum on account of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The regulatory leverage ratio was reported by eight PSIFIs-contributing jurisdictions, all of which have exceeded the 3% requirement.
- The Islamic banking segment’s performance grew by 4.3% in 2020, compared to 12.4% in 2019. As at third quarter of 2020, the Islamic banking segment accounts for 68.2% (72.4% in 2019) of the total value of Islamic financial services industry assets, the declining share being mainly due to increased prominence of the Islamic capital market segment.
With respect to the development of regulatory standards, the report notes that IFSB has nine standards, technical notes, and guidance notes under development. Those within the Islamic banking workstream include technical note on resolution and recovery plan for institutions offering Islamic financial services, technical note on Sharīʻah-compliant liquidity management tools, and guiding principles on corporate governance for institutions offering Islamic financial services.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Financial Stability Report, Islamic Banking, Basel, Liquidity Risk, Regulatory Capital, IFSB
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
BIS Publications Discuss Credit Losses and Window Dressing at BanksRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.