BIS Publications Discuss Credit Losses and Window Dressing at Banks
BIS published a working paper that examines whether banks are window dressing their balance sheets to avoid tougher regulation and a bulletin that discusses the forecast for corporate credit losses resulting from pandemic. The bulletin notes that credit risk forecasts should provide information both about losses in a baseline scenario (expected losses) and about the potential for extreme outcomes (unexpected losses). The results presented in the bulletin indicate that, while necessary and effective in containing losses so far, the policy response to the crisis has generated considerable uncertainty, with a wide range of possible loss rate paths up to 2024. To the extent that future losses fall outside government guarantees, the high unexpected loss forecasts indicate that the adequate amount of capital for exposures to U.S. corporate loans could be substantial.
The working paper on window dressing by banks explores whether banks are adjusting their balance sheets to avoid tougher regulation, by studying the assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). The paper examines the evolution of the G-SIB "score" around supervisory reporting dates for a large sample of banks in the European Union. The score is the regulatory measure that determines banks' G-SIB status and the attendant capital requirements. It predominantly relies on a snapshot of banks' balance sheets at year-end. The paper shows how banks in the European Union compress their G-SIB score at year-end and highlights that these adjustments distort the supervisory assessment of the systemic importance of banks. While a variety of factors may be driving banks' window dressing, the paper shows that the tightness of capital requirements plays an important role and sheds light on how the G-SIB rules interact with other regulatory requirements, such as national capital surcharges. The findings argue in favor of moving away from using point-in-time data in regulatory requirements and making greater use of averages. The findings also highlight the importance of supervisory judgment in the assessment of G-SIBs. This could help address window dressing by banks and mitigate any associated adverse impact on financial markets.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Credit Risk, Loan Moratorium, Public Guarantee Schemes, COVID-19, Debt Servicing Ratio, Basel, G-SIBs, Regulatory Capital, G-SIB Assessment, Window Dressing, BIS
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
BCL Updates Technical Specifications for AnaCredit ReportingRelated Articles
OSFI Issues Results of Pilot on Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
EC Issues Regulation on Adjustments to K-Factor Coefficients Under IFR
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
ECB Issues Opinions on Green Bonds Standard and CRR Proposals
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
ESRB Explores Policy Response to Risks Arising from Digitalization
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
HKMA Consults on FIRO Code, Revises Policy on Foreign Exchange Risk
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
FI Publishes Multiple Regulatory and Reporting Updates
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
EU Authorities Address COVID-19 Reporting, MCD, and PSD2 Issues
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
BSP Tackles Aspects of Lending and Islamic, Open & Sustainable Finance
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
US Agencies Issue Regulatory Updates, FDIC Launches Tech Sprint
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
EBA Issues Guide on Bank Resolvability, Consults on Transferability
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
