IASB (or the Board) has added the second phase of its project focused on potential financial reporting implications linked to the interest rate benchmark reform—interbank offer rate (IBOR) reform—to its work plan. Phase one of the project focuses on financial reporting issues in the period before the current interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative rate, while phase two focuses on potential issues that might affect financial reporting once the existing rate is replaced with an alternative rate.
As part of the work on the interest rate benchmark reform, the technical staff at IASB has started to analyze the issues to be considered as part of phase two. The Board will start deliberations on these matters during the third quarter of 2019. Under phase one of the interest rate benchmark reform, IASB, in May 2019, had published an Exposure Draft that proposes exceptions to specific hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9 and IAS 39. The Board met on July 25, 2019 to discuss the staff’s analysis of feedback on the phase one Exposure Draft, which proposes amendments to IFRS 9 and IAS 39. The Board is considering comments received on this Exposure Draft and aims to finalize the amendments as soon as possible.
Interest rate benchmarks such as IBORs play an important role in global financial markets. These benchmarks index a wide variety of financial products worth trillions of dollars and other currencies, ranging from mortgages to derivatives. Some jurisdictions have already made clear progress toward replacing existing benchmarks with the alternative, nearly risk-free rates. This work has, in turn, led to uncertainty about the future of existing interest rate benchmarks, which may affect financial reporting by companies. In 2018, the Board noted the increasing level of uncertainty about the long-term viability of some interest rate benchmarks and decided to add a project to its agenda to consider the financial reporting implications of the reform. In its outreach with stakeholders, the Board has identified two groups of accounting issues that could have financial reporting implications. These are:
- Pre-replacement issues (addressed in phase one)—These are issues affecting financial reporting in the period before the replacement of an existing interest rate benchmark with an alternative risk-free rate.
- Replacement issues (addressed in phase two)—These are issues that might affect financial reporting when an existing interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative risk-free rate.
Keywords: International, Accounting, Banking, Securities, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, Reporting, IFRS 9, IASB
Previous ArticleFED Updates Draft Instructions for Proposed FR Y-14 Reporting Forms
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.