IASB (or the Board) has added the second phase of its project focused on potential financial reporting implications linked to the interest rate benchmark reform—interbank offer rate (IBOR) reform—to its work plan. Phase one of the project focuses on financial reporting issues in the period before the current interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative rate, while phase two focuses on potential issues that might affect financial reporting once the existing rate is replaced with an alternative rate.
As part of the work on the interest rate benchmark reform, the technical staff at IASB has started to analyze the issues to be considered as part of phase two. The Board will start deliberations on these matters during the third quarter of 2019. Under phase one of the interest rate benchmark reform, IASB, in May 2019, had published an Exposure Draft that proposes exceptions to specific hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9 and IAS 39. The Board met on July 25, 2019 to discuss the staff’s analysis of feedback on the phase one Exposure Draft, which proposes amendments to IFRS 9 and IAS 39. The Board is considering comments received on this Exposure Draft and aims to finalize the amendments as soon as possible.
Interest rate benchmarks such as IBORs play an important role in global financial markets. These benchmarks index a wide variety of financial products worth trillions of dollars and other currencies, ranging from mortgages to derivatives. Some jurisdictions have already made clear progress toward replacing existing benchmarks with the alternative, nearly risk-free rates. This work has, in turn, led to uncertainty about the future of existing interest rate benchmarks, which may affect financial reporting by companies. In 2018, the Board noted the increasing level of uncertainty about the long-term viability of some interest rate benchmarks and decided to add a project to its agenda to consider the financial reporting implications of the reform. In its outreach with stakeholders, the Board has identified two groups of accounting issues that could have financial reporting implications. These are:
- Pre-replacement issues (addressed in phase one)—These are issues affecting financial reporting in the period before the replacement of an existing interest rate benchmark with an alternative risk-free rate.
- Replacement issues (addressed in phase two)—These are issues that might affect financial reporting when an existing interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative risk-free rate.
Keywords: International, Accounting, Banking, Securities, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, Reporting, IFRS 9, IASB
Previous ArticleBaFin Announces AFS Recommendation to Activate CCyB for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.