BIS Examines Bond Issuance and Syndicated Loan Origination Amid Crisis
BIS published a bulletin. or a short note, that examines bond issuance and syndicated loan origination during the COVID-19 crisis. The note explains that borrowing of non-financial firms in global debt markets surged following the COVID-19 shock. Bond issuance boomed, while syndicated loan origination trailed. The note highlights that, due to easier access to bond markets, large firms significantly increased their borrowing. The rest of the firms faced bottlenecks due to their reliance on a strained syndicated loan market and hurdles in switching to bond markets. Large firms, which had lower cash buffers before the crisis, in comparison to smaller firms, used part of the fresh credit to raise their buffers in addition to meeting liquidity shortfalls.
The findings draw on the worldwide bond issuance and loan origination by non-financial firms in debt market, which is a major source of funding for large and mid-size firms. As of the end of 2019, firms from 121 jurisdictions had outstanding bonds and syndicated loans. Using the global debt market data for up to early June 2020, BIS documented that bond issuance surged but syndicated loan origination trailed. Net bond issuance rose substantially relative to levels seen during the previous year. In contrast, syndicated loan origination did not follow the surge in bond issuance. The decoupling of bond and syndicated loan markets is reminiscent of a broadly similar trend observed during the great financial crisis. Although the current crisis did not originate in the banking sector, banks seem to be pulling in their horns as their lending capacities have been hit and a dim economic outlook has made them more cautious. Meanwhile, collateralized loan obligation (CLO) issuance has declined and end-investors have become more risk-averse, which has created additional blockages in the complex plumbing of the syndicated loan market.
A firm-level perspective shows that borrowing by large firms in debt markets has outpaced that of mid-size firms. At the firm level, the bulk of new borrowing has been raised by large firms—with revenues above USD 1 billion—reflecting their better access to the booming bond market. The greater share of large firms in new borrowing occurs despite the fact that they may be facing lower or comparable liquidity shortfalls compared with mid-sized firms. While large firms have probably used borrowing proceeds to meet short-term liquidity shortfalls, some indicators suggest that these firms are building precautionary buffers too. Likewise, an increase in the average tenor of issuance points to firms striving to avoid near-term refinancing needs. Like in the aftermath of the great financial crisis, large firms may gradually use or decommission these buffers and, thus, better cope with economic uncertainty. However, dominance in bond-based borrowing by large firms could crowd out mid-size firms, which are also creditworthy and may exhibit significant liquidity needs.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, COVID-19, Bond Issuance, Loan Origination, Syndicated Loans, Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, Collateralized Loan Obligations, BIS
Featured Experts

Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous Article
Bundesbank Circular Sets Out Changes Related to AnaCredit ReportingNext Article
BNM to Transfer Small Debt Resolution Scheme to AKPKRelated Articles
BIS Examines Use of Big Data and Machine Learning at Central Banks
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA Finalizes Reporting Standard for Operational Risk Requirements
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB Publishes Guide for Determining Penalties for Regulatory Breaches
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS Sets Out Good Practices to Manage Operational Risks Amid COVID
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR Announces New Data Collection Application for Banks and Insurers
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB Maintains CCyB at 0%, Initiates First Cycle of Regulatory Sandbox
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA Launches Study on Non-Life Underwriting Risk in Internal Models
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB Publishes Overview of Resolution Tools Available in Banking Union
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA Consults on Pillar 3 Disclosure Standards for ESG Risks Under CRR
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting