APRA is consulting on amendments to the prudential standard CPS 226 on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. One of the proposed revisions is to accommodate the decision of BCBS and IOSCO to delay the final implementation phase for margin requirements by one year, to September 01, 2021. The consultation period on CPS 226 ends on August 28, 2019 and the proposed changes apply to all authorized deposit-taking institutions, general insurers, life insurers, and registrable superannuation entity licensees.
BCBS and IOSCO have approved a one-year extension to the final implementation of margin requirements from September 01, 2020 to September 01, 2021.BCBS and IOSCO have also adjusted the phase-in schedule requiring covered entities with an aggregate average notional amount (AANA) of non-centrally cleared derivatives greater than EUR 50 billion to be subject to margin requirements from September 01, 2020. APRA supports this extension and proposes to delay the final implementation phase by one year from September 01, 2020 to September 01, 2021. APRA also proposes to increase the qualifying level of AANA of non-centrally cleared derivatives applicable from September 01, 2020 from AUD 12 billion to AUD 75 billion and to defer the application of margin requirements to APRA covered entities with an AANA of non-centrally cleared derivatives greater than AUD 12 billion to September 01, 2021. This amount has been determined using the exchange rate used to convert EUR amounts in CPS 226.
APRA is also proposing other amendments in response to the clarifications made by BCBS and IOSCO and is adding the UK’s PRA and FCA to the list of foreign bodies eligible for substituted compliance with the margin requirements in CPS 226, following Brexit. APRA has previously confirmed that the margin requirements of EC are equivalent to the margin requirements of APRA and substituted compliance is permitted under CPS 226. To ensure a smooth transition and greater certainty in the event of Brexit, APRA will amend the list of foreign bodies whose margin requirements are approved for substituted compliance with the margin requirements in CPS 226 to include the PRA and FCA, the entities that are are jointly responsible for margin requirements in UK, provided that the margin requirements of PRA and FCA are substantively unchanged following the withdrawal of UK from EU.
BCBS and IOSCO issued a joint statement in March 201 to clarify that the documentation, custodial, and operational requirements for initial margin do not apply in cases where the initial margin is less than EUR 50 million. Following this clarification by BCBS and IOSCO, APRA proposes to clarify that an APRA covered entity is not required to have initial margin documentation, custodial arrangements, and operational processes in place for posting and collecting initial margin in cases where the bilateral initial margin amount for a trading relationship is less than the AUD 75 million initial margin threshold. However, APRA would expect APRA covered entities to act diligently to monitor their exposures and ensure they have initial margin documentation, custodial arrangements, and operational processes in place for posting and collecting initial margin as their exposures approach the threshold. APRA also proposes to amend a footnote that provides the meaning of "new" non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions. Finally, APRA proposes to add that amending contracts for existing derivative transactions solely for the purpose of addressing interest rate benchmark reforms, such as the LIBOR reforms, would not qualify as new derivative transactions and are, therefore, not subject to margin requirements. This amendment is consistent with the BCBS and IOSCO public statement in March 2019.
Related Link: Consultation Letter (PDF)
Comment Due Date: August 28, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Pensions, Superannuation, EU, UK, CPS 226, Margin Requirements, Equivalence Regime, AANA, OTC Derivatives, Initial Margin, APRA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Consults on Reporting and Disclosures Under Solvency II Review
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.