APRA decided to apply an additional $250 million capital requirement to Allianz Australia Limited to reflect the issues identified in the risk governance self-assessment by the insurer. With this, Allianz Australia Limited becomes the fifth APRA-regulated entity to have an additional capital requirement imposed due to heightened operational risk, after Commonwealth Bank of Australia, ANZ, National Australia Bank, and Westpac. APRA has advised Allianz Australia Limited that the extra capital requirement will remain in place until it completes the remediation work underway to strengthen risk management and closes gaps identified in its self-assessment.
Allianz Australia Limited was one of the 36 banks, insurers and superannuation licensees that APRA had asked to undertake a self-assessment last year. The self-assessments were intended to gauge whether governance weaknesses identified by the Prudential Inquiry of APRA into the Commonwealth Bank of Australia also existed in other institutions. Overall, the self-assessments confirmed that many of the issues identified in the inquiry were not unique to Commonwealth Bank of Australia, including the need to strengthen non-financial risk management; ensure accountabilities are clear, cascaded, and enforced; and enhance risk culture. A number of common themes have emerged from the self-assessments:
- Non-financial risk management requires improvement
- Accountabilities are not always clear, cascaded, and effectively enforced
- Acknowledged weaknesses are well-known and some have been long-standing
- Risk culture is not well-understood and, therefore, may not be reinforcing the desired behaviors
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Insurance, Capital Requirements, Operational Risk, Allianz Australia Limited, Self Assessment, Governance, Prudential Inquiry, APRA
Previous ArticleIASB Adds Phase Two of IBOR Reform to Its Work Plan
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.