APRA decided to apply an additional $250 million capital requirement to Allianz Australia Limited to reflect the issues identified in the risk governance self-assessment by the insurer. With this, Allianz Australia Limited becomes the fifth APRA-regulated entity to have an additional capital requirement imposed due to heightened operational risk, after Commonwealth Bank of Australia, ANZ, National Australia Bank, and Westpac. APRA has advised Allianz Australia Limited that the extra capital requirement will remain in place until it completes the remediation work underway to strengthen risk management and closes gaps identified in its self-assessment.
Allianz Australia Limited was one of the 36 banks, insurers and superannuation licensees that APRA had asked to undertake a self-assessment last year. The self-assessments were intended to gauge whether governance weaknesses identified by the Prudential Inquiry of APRA into the Commonwealth Bank of Australia also existed in other institutions. Overall, the self-assessments confirmed that many of the issues identified in the inquiry were not unique to Commonwealth Bank of Australia, including the need to strengthen non-financial risk management; ensure accountabilities are clear, cascaded, and enforced; and enhance risk culture. A number of common themes have emerged from the self-assessments:
- Non-financial risk management requires improvement
- Accountabilities are not always clear, cascaded, and effectively enforced
- Acknowledged weaknesses are well-known and some have been long-standing
- Risk culture is not well-understood and, therefore, may not be reinforcing the desired behaviors
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Insurance, Capital Requirements, Operational Risk, Allianz Australia Limited, Self Assessment, Governance, Prudential Inquiry, APRA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Consults on Harmonization of Insurance Guarantee Schemes
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.