APRA decided to apply an additional $250 million capital requirement to Allianz Australia Limited to reflect the issues identified in the risk governance self-assessment by the insurer. With this, Allianz Australia Limited becomes the fifth APRA-regulated entity to have an additional capital requirement imposed due to heightened operational risk, after Commonwealth Bank of Australia, ANZ, National Australia Bank, and Westpac. APRA has advised Allianz Australia Limited that the extra capital requirement will remain in place until it completes the remediation work underway to strengthen risk management and closes gaps identified in its self-assessment.
Allianz Australia Limited was one of the 36 banks, insurers and superannuation licensees that APRA had asked to undertake a self-assessment last year. The self-assessments were intended to gauge whether governance weaknesses identified by the Prudential Inquiry of APRA into the Commonwealth Bank of Australia also existed in other institutions. Overall, the self-assessments confirmed that many of the issues identified in the inquiry were not unique to Commonwealth Bank of Australia, including the need to strengthen non-financial risk management; ensure accountabilities are clear, cascaded, and enforced; and enhance risk culture. A number of common themes have emerged from the self-assessments:
- Non-financial risk management requires improvement
- Accountabilities are not always clear, cascaded, and effectively enforced
- Acknowledged weaknesses are well-known and some have been long-standing
- Risk culture is not well-understood and, therefore, may not be reinforcing the desired behaviors
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Insurance, Capital Requirements, Operational Risk, Allianz Australia Limited, Self Assessment, Governance, Prudential Inquiry, APRA
Previous ArticleIASB Adds Phase Two of IBOR Reform to Its Work Plan
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).