APRA published a discussion paper that outlines the potential approaches to adjust the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions to make capital ratios more transparent, comparable, and flexible. These approaches focus on amending disclosure requirements and the way in which institutions would be required to calculate and report capital ratios, without altering the quantum and risk-sensitivity of capital requirements. Written submissions must be sent by November 02, 2018.
The approaches would not change the amount of capital authorized deposit-taking institutions are required to hold beyond the unquestionably strong capital benchmarks announced in July 2017. Rather, APRA is considering whether to alter the way authorized deposit-taking institutions’ capital requirements are calculated and disclosed to facilitate greater domestic and international comparability and transparency of capital strength. The discussion paper outlines two general approaches designed to aid authorized deposit-taking institutions in representing and communicating their capital strength:
- Under the first approach, authorized deposit-taking institutions would continue using existing definitions of capital and risk-weighted assets, but APRA would develop a methodology allowing them to improve the credibility and robustness of internationally comparable capital ratio disclosures
- Under a second approach, APRA would change the way authorized deposit-taking institutions calculate capital ratios to instead use more internationally harmonized definitions of capital and risk-weighted assets. To maintain the strength and risk-sensitivity of the capital framework, there would need to be corresponding increases in minimum ratio and/or capital buffer requirements.
The discussion paper also proposes measures to make the capital framework more flexible in times of stress, including by increasing the size of regulatory capital buffers relative to minimum regulatory capital requirements. APRA is open to considering these approaches independently or in combination, or indeed retaining its current methodology, and is seeking industry feedback on whether the benefits of the suggested approaches outweigh the regulatory burden and associated increase in complexity. APRA intends to consult on draft revised prudential standards incorporating the outcome of this consultation in 2019. APRA expects that final prudential standards would be released by mid-2020. In finalizing the revised capital framework, APRA will have regard to the Basel III implementation timetable. However, as indicated in the February 2018 Discussion Paper, it is likely that the revised prudential requirements would commence from January 01, 2021
Comment Due Date: November 02, 2018
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Banking, Capital Framework, Basel III, Regulatory Capital, Disclosures, APRA
Previous ArticleIMF Report on 2018 Article IV Consultation with Dominican Republic
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).