August 14, 2018

APRA published a discussion paper that outlines the potential approaches to adjust the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions to make capital ratios more transparent, comparable, and flexible. These approaches focus on amending disclosure requirements and the way in which institutions would be required to calculate and report capital ratios, without altering the quantum and risk-sensitivity of capital requirements. Written submissions must be sent by November 02, 2018.

The approaches would not change the amount of capital authorized deposit-taking institutions are required to hold beyond the unquestionably strong capital benchmarks announced in July 2017. Rather, APRA is considering whether to alter the way authorized deposit-taking institutions’ capital requirements are calculated and disclosed to facilitate greater domestic and international comparability and transparency of capital strength. The discussion paper outlines two general approaches designed to aid authorized deposit-taking institutions in representing and communicating their capital strength:

  • Under the first approach, authorized deposit-taking institutions would continue using existing definitions of capital and risk-weighted assets, but APRA would develop a methodology allowing them to improve the credibility and robustness of internationally comparable capital ratio disclosures
  • Under a second approach, APRA would change the way authorized deposit-taking institutions calculate capital ratios to instead use more internationally harmonized definitions of capital and risk-weighted assets. To maintain the strength and risk-sensitivity of the capital framework, there would need to be corresponding increases in minimum ratio and/or capital buffer requirements.

The discussion paper also proposes measures to make the capital framework more flexible in times of stress, including by increasing the size of regulatory capital buffers relative to minimum regulatory capital requirements. APRA is open to considering these approaches independently or in combination, or indeed retaining its current methodology, and is seeking industry feedback on whether the benefits of the suggested approaches outweigh the regulatory burden and associated increase in complexity. APRA intends to consult on draft revised prudential standards incorporating the outcome of this consultation in 2019. APRA expects that final prudential standards would be released by mid-2020. In finalizing the revised capital framework, APRA will have regard to the Basel III implementation timetable. However, as indicated in the February 2018 Discussion Paper, it is likely that the revised prudential requirements would commence from January 01, 2021

 

Related Links

Comment Due Date: November 02, 2018

Keywords: Asia Pacific, Banking, Capital Framework, Basel III, Regulatory Capital, Disclosures, APRA

Related Articles
News

US Agencies Adopt Rule to Exclude Community Banks from Volcker Rule

US Agencies (CFTC, FDIC, FED, OCC, and SEC) adopted a final rule to exclude community banks from the Volcker Rule, in line with amendments to certain sections of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Amendments to Simplify Regulatory Capital Rules

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that reduces regulatory burden by simplifying several requirements in the regulatory capital rules for banks.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IA of Hong Kong Delegates Inspection and Investigation Powers to HKMA

HKMA and IA of Hong Kong jointly issued a statement announcing the delegation of the inspection and investigation powers of IA to HKMA, pursuant to the statutory regulatory regime for insurance intermediaries under the Insurance Ordinance.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Policy Recommendations on SFTs

FSB announced adjustments to the implementation timelines for its recommendations on securities financing transactions (SFTs), specifically those related to the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared SFTs.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for July 2019

EBA published answers to six questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool this week.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Report Assesses Regulatory Framework for Fintech Activities

EBA published the findings of its analysis on the regulatory framework applicable to fintech firms when accessing the market.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Revises Capital Requirements for Operational Risk for Banks

OSFI is revising its capital requirements for operational risk, in line with the final Basel III revisions published by BCBS in December 2017.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Consults on Revised Principles for Management of Liquidity Risk

OSFI proposed revisions to Guideline B-6 on the principles for the management of liquidity risk.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ESMA Guidance on Disclosures for Credit Rating Sustainability Issues

ESMA published the technical advice on sustainability considerations in the credit rating market, along with the final guidelines on disclosure requirements applicable to credit ratings.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Issues Q&A on Estimation of Expected Credit Losses by Firms

FASB issued a second question-and-answer (Q&A) document that addresses more than a dozen frequently asked questions related to the Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13 titled “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”

July 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3482