The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a follow-up report to the 2018 peer review on the supervisory practices for the application of proportionality principle in governance requirements with respect to the identified key functions and in the context of the Solvency II Directive. The follow-up report assesses how national competent authorities have implemented the recommended actions from the original peer review. The original peer review had assessed how national competent authorities supervise and whether an insurer’s setting of key functions fulfills the legal requirements of Solvency II, with an emphasis on proportionality. Based on the findings of the follow-up exercise, EIOPA concludes that twelve national competent authorities have fully implemented their recommended actions and six national competent authorities have partially implemented the recommended actions addressed to them.
The areas for which the original peer review had identified recommended actions included supervisory approach of national competent authorities, combinations of key function holders, combinations of key functions with operational tasks, subordination of a key function holder to another key function holder or head of operational department, and outsourcing. To implement the recommended actions in the area of supervisory approach of national authorities, the national authorities have developed or amended their national internal supervisory guidance or supervisory internal guidelines including the guidance for on-site inspections. Some national authorities have changed the registration for notifications of key function holders with regard to content and technical option for submission while others have implemented/amended their internal data collection or documentation tools to allow for a better overview and analysis of information received by supervised undertakings.
The follow-up report also addresses the monitoring of how the best practices, as identified in the past peer review, have been considered, implemented, or further developed by the national competent authorities. The review notes that most of these best practices have been taken up by national competent authorities, fostering a coherent and consistent application of supervisory guidance:
- The majority of national competent authorities have adopted a structured proportionate supervisory approach, including the introduction of a supervisory documentation tool and consistent data submission for key function holders.
- Most national competent authorities have taken actions to ensure both high-quality supervision for governance issues and the application of the principle of proportionality in a coherent way.
- Some supervisory measures—in particular the assessment of whether administrative, management or supervisory body members challenge the key function holder who are also an administrative, management or supervisory body member—tend to be applied on a case-by-case approach, especially toward high-risk undertakings.
- Most national competent authorities meet key function holders on a regular basis as part of their annual supervisory review plan.
Overall, EIOPA has found that the supervision of key function holders has improved during the last two years; however, in a small number of countries the development of supervisory practices are still in progress. EIOPA invites national competent authorities that have not yet fully implemented the recommended actions to consider the identified examples as inspiration for the development of their national supervisory practices. The six national competent authorities with partially fulfilled recommended actions, are expected to inform EIOPA, within six months of the approval of the follow-up report, about the implementation of the recommended action. This will then close the cycle of this peer review. After the closing of the peer review cycle, EIOPA will use a risk-based approach to monitor national authorities’ full or partial implementation of their recommended actions and will report on progress to the Board of Supervisors. A summary of the findings and any further progress will be included in supervisory activities report of EIOPA. EIOPA will also consider how best practices can be included in EIOPA’s supervisory handbook to foster convergence in the application of the principle of proportionality.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Peer Review, Governance, Proportionality, National Competent Authorities, Insurance Supervision, Solvency II, EIOPA
Previous ArticleACPR Publishes Corrective Version of RUBA Taxonomy
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.