Featured Product

    IMF Paper Examines If Bank Lobbying in US Leads to Regulatory Capture

    August 09, 2019

    IMF published a working paper on whether and how bank lobbying in the United States can lead to regulatory capture and can have real consequences. The paper discusses the importance of bank lobbying in the United States, along with the motivations behind bank lobbying by outlining a conceptual framework of regulatory capture. It also examines the impact of lobbying on financial regulation and supervision by reviewing recent empirical evidence. The findings of the study are consistent with regulatory capture, which lessens the support for tighter rules and enforcement. While the findings should not be interpreted as a call for an outright ban of lobbying, they point in the direction of a need for rethinking the framework governing interactions between regulators and banks.

    Among other things, the paper presents evidence on the effect of the rising political influence of the banking industry on the global financial crisis. It summarizes the recent, systematic evidence on the banking industry capturing the government through its lobbying activities. The focus of the paper is on financial regulation, supervision, and outcomes during the global financial crisis. The overall findings are consistent with a regulatory capture view of bank lobbying. This in turn allows riskier practices and worse economic outcomes. The evidence provides insights into how the rising political power of banks in the early 2000s propelled the financial system and the economy into crisis. The findings point in the direction of a need for rethinking the framework governing interactions between regulators and the industry, including their lobbyists. 

    The authors stressed on two avenues that they believe are crucial to contain regulatory capture at more “acceptable” levels—that is, levels at which the benefit of regulation exceeds the cost of regulatory capture:

    • The first avenue is to enhance the transparency of regulatory decisions by mandating the ex-post disclosure of how they are made. The systematic, ex-post disclosure of information on regulatory decisions would increase regulators’ accountability both toward the general public and toward other (potentially competing) parties.
    • The second avenue is about placing checks and balances in the decision-making process at regulators. Implementing structures of checks and balances involving the less politically powerful interest groups would induce a re-balance of the dominant position currently held by the banking industry. 

     

    Related Link: Working Paper

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Bank Lobbying, Regulatory Capture, Regulation and Supervision, Research, Deregulation in US, IMF

    Related Articles

    PRA Publishes Q&A on Property Valuation Requirements Under CRR

    PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.

    May 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IOSCO Consults on Outsourcing Principles for Operational Resilience

    IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.

    May 28, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Consortium to Develop AI Fairness Metrics for Credit Scoring

    MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.

    May 28, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News

    BoE Updates Definitions for BTL Data Collection

    BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.

    May 28, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSI Examines Financial Stability Implications of Payment Deferrals

    FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    May 28, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Finalizes Policy on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II

    PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.

    May 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA on Extending Large Exposure Limits for French Systemic Banks

    EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    May 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Highlights NPL Resolution as Key Policy Issue in Post-COVID Europe

    As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.

    May 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    RBNZ Publishes Financial Stability Report for May 2020

    RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.

    May 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Updates Guidance on Reporting of Securities Holdings Statistics

    ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).

    May 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5231