FED Paper Examines Impact of Current Expected Credit Loss Standard
FED published a working paper that examines the accounting and economic impact of the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) standard. The paper presents a framework that captures a simple and relatively direct impact of CECL on credit availability. The CECL standard will soon replace the incurred loss method (ILM) for the recognition of credit losses in financial accounts. The resulting changes to the timing and magnitude of loss allowances will affect the regulatory capital of banks. As the date of implementation approaches, several commentators have raised concerns that the standard will have a “procyclical” impact, reducing lending in downturns. In contrast, the findings in this study suggest that CECL will modestly affect bank lending in a way that dampens fluctuations.
The paper highlights that CECL results in earlier accumulation of allowances prior to recessions than the ILM. This feature of the standard encourages banks to deleverage and raise capital before credit conditions are at their tightest. However, CECL may also result in a larger accumulation of allowances around recessions, potentially encouraging banks to deleverage more. Accounting for both of these effects, CECL would have reduced lending in the lead up to the financial crisis and increased it during the recovery, modestly decreasing the volatility of lending growth. These conclusions are robust to a range of assumptions about banks’ foresight of losses and management of capital ratios. The framework presented in this paper does not incorporate potential effects of CECL on the composition of bank lending and loan pricing., which could further reduce cyclicality. The analysis may overstate the magnitude of the impact of CECL to the extent that
- Banks have significant discretion when modeling CECL allowance for credit losses
- Banks are indifferent to the shorter-term shifts between allowances
- Capital implied by CECL or the capital impact at banks subject to comprehensive capital analysis and review (CCAR) is roughly offset by reductions in the modeled stress losses
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Accounting, CECL, Regulatory Capital, Incurred Loss Method, CCAR, Research, IFRS 9, FED
Featured Experts
Scott Dietz
Scott is a Director in the Regulatory and Accounting Solutions team responsible for providing accounting expertise across solutions, products, and services offered by Moody’s Analytics in the US. He has over 15 years of experience leading auditing, consulting and accounting policy initiatives for financial institutions.
Anna Krayn
CECL adoption expert; engagement manager for loss estimation, internal risk capability enhancement, and counterparty credit risk management
Masha Muzyka
CECL, IFRS 9, and IFRS 17 expert; credit risk and insurance risk specialist; strategic planning and credit analytics solutions consultant
Previous Article
FED Proposes to Revise and Extend Form FR Y-9CRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
