Featured Product

    FSB Report Maps Interdependencies Between CCPs and Clearing Members

    August 09, 2018

    FSB and other international standard-setters (CPMI, IOSCO, and BCBS) published the second report that maps interdependencies between central counterparties (CCPs) and their clearing members and other financial service providers. The international standard-setters had published the first report on central clearing interdependencies in July 2017.

    To assess whether the findings of the July 2017 report (based on data as of September 2016) were stable over time, the international standard-setters conducted another more streamlined data collection (as of October 2017) from the same 26 CCPs. The results are broadly consistent with the previous analysis and show that:

    • Prefunded financial resources are concentrated at a small number of CCPs. The two largest CCPs account for nearly 40% of total prefunded financial resources provided to all CCPs, compared with 32% in the July 2017 report.
    • Exposures to CCPs are concentrated among a small number of entities. The largest 11 of the 306 clearing members are connected to between 16 and 25 CCPs. 
    • The relationships mapped are characterized, to varying degrees, by a core of highly connected CCPs and entities and a periphery of less highly connected CCPs and entities. However, even the less highly connected CCPs often are linked to at least one highly connected entity that indirectly connects the CCP into the more interconnected part of the network structure. 
    • A small number of entities tend to dominate the provision of each of the critical services required by CCPs. This relationship between CCPs and other entities suggests that a failure at one of these central elements of a CCP network would likely have significant consequences for the rest of the network.
    • Clearing members and clearing member affiliates are also important providers of other critical services required by CCPs and can maintain several types of relationships with multiple CCPs simultaneously. 

    There are, however, some changes to highlight in the interdependencies in central clearing. For instance, the concentration of client clearing activity has decreased. Initial margins from clients are now concentrated in two CCPs, compared to only one. The analysis of interdependencies in central clearing is intended to provide useful inputs for designing supervisory stress tests and has informed the policy work as set out in the joint workplan to promote CCP resilience, recovery, and resolvability. The standard-setters published a report on the implementation of the workplan in July 2017.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, PMI, Securities, CCPs, OTC Derivatives, Central Clearing, FSB, CPMI/IOSCO, BCBS

    Related Articles
    News

    PRA Consults on Implementation of Certain Provisions of CRD5

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).

    July 31, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Report Identifies Key Financial Stability Risks for Insurers

    EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Risk Dashboard for First Quarter of 2020

    EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Updates on Stress Test Exercise for Banks in EU

    EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposes Guidance Related to Matching Adjustment under Solvency II

    PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Issues Guidance on Dividend Distributions by Banks

    MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Updates Guidance on Capital Management for Banks

    APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Report Reviews Macro-Prudential Framework and Tools in Germany

    FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Urges Firms to Finalize Preparations for End of Brexit Transition

    EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB on Operational Continuity in Resolution and FMI Contingency Plans

    SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5604