Featured Product

    MAS Launches Sandbox Express for Faster Market Testing

    August 07, 2019

    MAS launched Sandbox Express to provide firms with a faster option to test innovative financial products and services in the market. The market testing in the predefined environment of Sandbox Express can be done within 21 days of applying to MAS, instead of taking a longer time to customize sandboxes under the existing FinTech Regulatory Sandbox. MAS also published the guidelines for Sandbox Express and the response to feedback received for the consultation paper on Sandbox Express, which was published on November 14, 2018.

    The Sandbox Express was created to complement the FinTech Regulatory Sandbox. Sandbox Express shortens the approval process for entry into the sandbox by relying on standard disclosures and predetermined rules. Hence, Sandbox Express is only suitable for activities where the risks are low and well-understood by the market and can be reasonably managed within predefined parameters. For more complex business models or in cases where MAS requires more time to understand the risks associated with activities, the FinTech Regulatory Sandbox remains open for applicants. The FinTech Regulatory Sandbox, which has been operational since 2016, requires an extensive review of each application, as each sandbox is customized to facilitate meaningful experiments while trying to contain the consequences of failure. 

    In the beginning, Sandbox Express will be available specifically for insurance brokers, recognized market operators, and remittance businesses. Each sandbox will have predefined boundaries, regulatory reliefs, and expectations. The firms are required to comply with all conditions of approval, including providing clear and proper disclosure to the customer as well as submitting regular progress reports to MAS. The experiments conducted can remain in Sandbox Express for up to nine months. This will provide firms with more time to overcome business and technical challenges during experimentation and will enable MAS to address  the potential regulatory challenges. Firms could also use the longer duration to better prepare for exiting the sandbox and deploying their innovation on a larger scale.

    Along with the guidelines, MAS published three Annexes containing sandbox constructs, application form, and progress reporting form. Respondents to the consultation for Sandbox Express were broadly supportive of the Sandbox Express to complement the current sandbox approach. They also welcomed the initial set of sandboxes under Sandbox Express as well as the flexibility to update them over time. MAS will take a phased approach by starting with an initial set of regulated activities and will continue to review whether appropriate constructs could be established to facilitate meaningful experiments for other activities it regulates while containing risk. A phased approach will also allow MAS to test the relevance and risks of Sandbox Express as well as resolve potential operational challenges.

     

    Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, FinTech Regulatory Sandbox, Sandbox Express, FinTech, Testing, MAS

    Related Articles
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 848 and 470

    FASB proposed taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on topic 848 on facilitation of effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Statement on Recalculating Transitional Measures Under Solvency II

    BoE notified that it will be willing to accept applications from firms to recalculate transitional measure on technical provisions (TMTP) as at September 30, 2019.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Paper on Market-Implied Systemic Risk and Shadow Capital Adequacy

    BoE published a working paper that presents a forward-looking approach to measure systemic solvency risk.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Policy Module on Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is consulting on the revised Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-G-5 that sets out the HKMA approach to conducting the supervisory review process under Pillar 2.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Publishes Waiver by Consent of Continuity of Access Rules

    PRA published a new waiver by consent to waive the Continuity of Access requirements contained in the Depositor Protection Part of the PRA Rulebook (DPP).

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for September 2019

    EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool with answers to three questions.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Revises Branch Return and Updates Guidance for Regulatory Reports

    PRA published the policy statement PS17/19, which contains the final policy related to changes in the format and content of the Branch Return Form and reporting guidance.

    September 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA Guide on Collateral Management Under Smart Derivatives Contracts

    ISDA published the third in a series of legal guidelines for smart derivatives contracts.

    September 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESA Report Highlights Risks of No-Deal Brexit in EU Financial System

    ESAs published a Joint Committee report on risks and vulnerabilities in the EU financial system.

    September 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Modifies New Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operations

    The Governing Council of ECB decided to modify some of the key parameters of the third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTRO III) to preserve favorable bank lending conditions (Decision (EU) 2019/1558).

    September 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3820