ISDA and Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the interim report on climate benchmarks and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures of benchmarks by the EU Technical Expert Group (TEG) on sustainable finance. ISDA-AFME discusses the need for flexibility in benchmark methodologies and proportionality in relation to ESG disclosure requirements under the EU Benchmarks Regulation.
Proportionality in the European Benchmarks Regulation shall apply in relation to ESG disclosures for non-ESG benchmarks. ISDA and AFME would welcome that the requirements for non-significant benchmarks in relation to ESG criteria and carbon emissions disclosures should follow a consistent proportionality approach—that is, ESG disclosure requirements for significant benchmarks shall be more comprehensive than for non-significant benchmarks. ISDA and AFME would welcome the TEG final report to reflect this proportionality, as disclosure of ESG factors and Key Performance Indicator (KPIs) should be in the form of guidelines rather than being mandatory for non-significant benchmarks.
Differentiation by asset class, type of benchmarks, and investor need is necessary for effective ESG disclosures. Given the characteristics and diversity of benchmarks, ISDA and AFME welcome the TEG approach to adapt disclosure requirements to different asset classes. ISDA and AFME welcome that derivative instruments for the transfer of credit risk, such as credit default swaps or CDS, should not apply ESG disclosure, agreeing with the TEG analysis that setting any ESG disclosures for a CDS index would essentially require disclosing the characteristics of a second-level structured product. ISDA and AFME support an exemption of the ESG disclosures for all derivatives benchmarks that do not specifically pursue ESG objectives. ISDA and AFME would like to call on EC to consider the different types of investment styles when preparing the delegated act on minimum requirements for ESG disclosure.
Availability of high-quality and affordable data needs to be enhanced. ISDA and AFME support the TEG recommendation for a non-disclosure option in the template for the methodology and the benchmark statement. This is also in line with the primary legislation (level 1 text of the EU Benchmarks Regulation). If ESG data disclosure requirements are too rigid, the required growth of the ESG market, needed to fulfill the overarching objective of the sustainable finance agenda may be jeopardized. To facilitate the availability of data, the co-legislators and the EC, depending on the type of legislation, shall align disclosure requirements resulting from other financial services legislation with the requirements of the Benchmarks Regulation.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Climate Benchmarks, ESG, Disclosures, Proportionality, Benchmarks Regulation, AFME, ISDA
Previous ArticleIMF Publishes Reports Under 2019 Article IV Consultation with Latvia
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.