ESAs responded to EC about the exclusion of a few proposed options for presenting information on performance scenarios to be tested during a consumer testing exercise by EC under the Level 2 Review of the Regulation on key information document (KID) for Packaged Retail and Insurance-Based Investment Products (PRIIPs Delegated Regulation 2017/653). ESAs proposed the options on May 23, 2019 while EC informed ESAs, on July 19, 2019, that three of the proposed options will be excluded.
ESAs consider that consumer testing can bring the best insights if a wide range of different approaches and options are first put on the table. The key points covered in the response include the following:
- In relation to Option 4 for the structured product, ESAs disagree with the assessment that this option should not be included because it overlaps with Option 3. While the information is included as well in Option 3, the aim of Option 4 is to assess the effectiveness of showing only one set of performance information. Such an approach will be taken for other options that will be part of the testing. In addition, the discussions on developing the methodologies that would underlie the different performance scenario presentations are still ongoing. Therefore, ESAs think it is premature to reject this option at this stage on the basis that it is unclear who would define “what if” scenarios and is not consistent with the approach taken for other options that will be tested.
- In relation to Option 5 for insurance-based investment products (IBIPs), ESAs recognize it will be important to further streamline options before finalizing proposals for the technical standards. However, this can be done better on the basis of the results from the consumer testing, rather than preemptively.
- In relation to Option 6 for IBIPs, ESAs disagree that it does not give the right information and that it is not transparent to show an average past performance at different time periods rather than annually. For shorter-term liquid PRIIPs, communicating volatility can be most relevant. However, for longer-term products, the evidence is that investors do not respond to volatility and interim losses in a way that is in their best interests. This is a well-known issue of poor market timing by consumers and has long been a specific challenge in the context of retirement savings vehicles, where short-term volatility can lead to investors stopping their contributions prematurely or worse.
Since ESAs continue to regard these as relevant options, the authorities are considering whether to include these options in an upcoming consultation paper, even if they are not part of the consumer testing, with the aim to receive feedback from external stakeholders, including consumer associations and their representatives.
- Press Release
- Response of ESAs to EC (PDF)
- EC Letter on Exclusion of Proposed Options, July 2019 (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, PRIIPs, KID, Consumer Testing Exercise, PRIIPs Regulation, IBIPs, Structured Products, ESAs, EC
Previous ArticleIFSB Paper Explores Inter-Sectoral Linkages in Islamic Finance
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.