ECB, in the fifth issue of its Economic Bulletin, published an article examining the risks posed by crypto-assets and the ways to enhance monitoring of these risks. The article describes the characteristics of crypto-assets, identifies the primary risks of crypto-assets that warrant continuous monitoring, and outlines the linkages that could cause a risk spillover. It then discusses the indicators for monitoring crypto-assets (based on publicly available data), the availability and reliability of data, existing data gaps, and ongoing statistical initiatives of ECB that attempt to overcome the outstanding challenges. Finally, the article offers a number of conclusions and points to the way forward for monitoring crypto-assets.
The article highlights that crypto-assets can be defined and analyzed from different perspectives, namely their underlying technology, their features, and the economic implications of such assets. ECB chose to define crypto-assets as a new type of asset recorded in digital form and the focus is on the regulatory, economic, and business dimension of crypto-assets as a new asset class, rather than on the use of technologies that are needed for its existence. The article highlights that crypto-asset risks primarily originate from the lack of an underlying claim, their (partially) unregulated nature, and the absence of a formal governance structure. The extent to which the financial system and the economy may be exposed to crypto-asset risks depends on their interconnectedness. Holdings of crypto-assets, investment vehicles, and retail payments represent the main linkages among the crypto-asset market, the financial systems, and the broader economy.
Crypto-assets are enabled by distributed ledger technology and characterized by the lack of an underlying claim. In the light of the implications they might have for the stability and efficiency of the financial system and the economy and for the fulfillment of the functions of the Eurosystem, it is believed that crypto-assets warrant continuous monitoring. Thus, ECB has set up a dataset based on high-quality publicly available aggregated data complemented with other data from some commercial sources, using application programming interfaces and big data technologies. However, important gaps and challenges remain: exposures of financial institutions to crypto-assets, inter-linkages with the regulated financial sectors, and payment transactions that include the use of layered protocols are all examples of domains with prominent data gaps.
The challenges in measuring the phenomenon of crypto-assets are diverse and relate both to on-chain and off-chain data. Additionally, new and unexpected data needs may well arise with further advancements in crypto-assets and related innovation. Statistical initiatives by ECB and the central banking community are expected to provide a valuable input to efforts aimed at closing the data gaps associated with crypto-assets. Looking ahead, ECB will continue to work on indicators and data by dealing with the complexity and growing challenges encountered in analyzing on-chain and layered protocol transactions. Furthermore, investigation will continue on the new data sources for information on inter-linkages of crypto-assets. With respect to the off-chain transactions, amid a multitude of methodological options, further work will focus on increasing the availability and transparency of the reported data and the methodologies used, harmonizing and enriching the metadata, and developing best practices for indicators on crypto-assets.
Related Link: Article on Crypto-Assets
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Crypto Assets, Distributed Ledger Technology, Economic Bulletin, Fintech, Big Data, ECB
Previous ArticleIA Publishes Guideline on Enterprise Risk Management for Insurers
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.