ECB, in the fifth issue of its Economic Bulletin, published an article examining the risks posed by crypto-assets and the ways to enhance monitoring of these risks. The article describes the characteristics of crypto-assets, identifies the primary risks of crypto-assets that warrant continuous monitoring, and outlines the linkages that could cause a risk spillover. It then discusses the indicators for monitoring crypto-assets (based on publicly available data), the availability and reliability of data, existing data gaps, and ongoing statistical initiatives of ECB that attempt to overcome the outstanding challenges. Finally, the article offers a number of conclusions and points to the way forward for monitoring crypto-assets.
The article highlights that crypto-assets can be defined and analyzed from different perspectives, namely their underlying technology, their features, and the economic implications of such assets. ECB chose to define crypto-assets as a new type of asset recorded in digital form and the focus is on the regulatory, economic, and business dimension of crypto-assets as a new asset class, rather than on the use of technologies that are needed for its existence. The article highlights that crypto-asset risks primarily originate from the lack of an underlying claim, their (partially) unregulated nature, and the absence of a formal governance structure. The extent to which the financial system and the economy may be exposed to crypto-asset risks depends on their interconnectedness. Holdings of crypto-assets, investment vehicles, and retail payments represent the main linkages among the crypto-asset market, the financial systems, and the broader economy.
Crypto-assets are enabled by distributed ledger technology and characterized by the lack of an underlying claim. In the light of the implications they might have for the stability and efficiency of the financial system and the economy and for the fulfillment of the functions of the Eurosystem, it is believed that crypto-assets warrant continuous monitoring. Thus, ECB has set up a dataset based on high-quality publicly available aggregated data complemented with other data from some commercial sources, using application programming interfaces and big data technologies. However, important gaps and challenges remain: exposures of financial institutions to crypto-assets, inter-linkages with the regulated financial sectors, and payment transactions that include the use of layered protocols are all examples of domains with prominent data gaps.
The challenges in measuring the phenomenon of crypto-assets are diverse and relate both to on-chain and off-chain data. Additionally, new and unexpected data needs may well arise with further advancements in crypto-assets and related innovation. Statistical initiatives by ECB and the central banking community are expected to provide a valuable input to efforts aimed at closing the data gaps associated with crypto-assets. Looking ahead, ECB will continue to work on indicators and data by dealing with the complexity and growing challenges encountered in analyzing on-chain and layered protocol transactions. Furthermore, investigation will continue on the new data sources for information on inter-linkages of crypto-assets. With respect to the off-chain transactions, amid a multitude of methodological options, further work will focus on increasing the availability and transparency of the reported data and the methodologies used, harmonizing and enriching the metadata, and developing best practices for indicators on crypto-assets.
Related Link: Article on Crypto-Assets
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Crypto Assets, Distributed Ledger Technology, Economic Bulletin, Fintech, Big Data, ECB
Previous ArticleDubai FSA and CBE Sign MoU to Facilitate Supervisory Tasks
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.