RBI issued a circular that addresses the treatment of debt mutual funds/exchange-traded funds (ETFs) while computing capital charge for market risk under the Basel III capital regulations. According to Para 8.4.1 of the Master Circular on Basel III capital regulations, capital charge for equities is applicable to units of mutual funds. This recent circular details the RBI decision on computation of capital charge for market risk for the banks investing in a debt mutual fund/ETF with underlying comprising the Central, State, and Foreign Central Governments’ bonds; bank bonds; and corporate bonds (other than bank bonds).
Under the Basel III capital rules in the Master Circular, the minimum capital requirement is expressed in terms of two separately calculated charges. One is the "specific risk" charge for each security, which is designed to protect against an adverse movement in the price of an individual security owing to factors related to the individual issuer, both for short (short position is not allowed in India except in derivatives and Central Government Securities) and long positions. The other is the "general market risk" charge toward interest rate risk in the portfolio, where long and short positions (which is not allowed in India except in derivatives and Central Government Securities) in different securities or instruments can be offset. The circular covers the following points with respect to the computation of capital charge for market risk:
- Investment in debt mutual fund/ETF, for which full constituent debt details are available, shall attract general market risk charge of 9%, as hitherto. Additionally, the Annex to this recent circular details the application of specific risk capital charge for exposures to securities issued by Indian and foreign sovereigns, bonds issued by banks, and corporate bonds (other than bank bonds).
- In case of debt mutual fund/ETF, which contains a mix of the debt instruments, the specific risk capital charge shall be computed based on the lowest rated debt instrument or instrument attracting the highest specific risk capital charge in the fund.
- Debt mutual fund/ETF, for which constituent debt details are not available, at least as of each month-end, shall continue to be treated on par with equity for computation of capital charge for market risk, as prescribed in Para 8.4.1 of the Master Circular on Basel III capital regulations.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Market Risk, Mutual Funds, ETF, RBI
Previous ArticleRBI Announces Additional Regulatory Policy Measures Amid Pandemic
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.