ISDA explained its opinion on the standardization and digitization of financial/derivatives contracts and the associated documentation. A recent survey shows that members of ISDA from different business functions supported the ISDA objective of developing standards and digital formats for documentation and other products to support automation. ISDA is planning to make its forthcoming 2020 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions available in a digital format—in line with the priority expressed by members in the survey. ISDA is also looking to align and integrate the digital documentation and legal data with other standards. ISDA, along with several other Associations, has written a letter to FSB, IOSCO, and BCBS to assert their joint commitment to defining and promoting the development of a digital future for financial markets, focused on three core areas: standardization, digitization, and distribution.
The Associations include Association of German Banks, the Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA), International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the International Islamic Financial Market, the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA), LBMA, and UK Finance. The letter highlights that the adoption of common data and process standards across the industry will allow for the consistent aggregation of global financial data and more comprehensive risk assessment of supervised firms, promoting greater confidence in the integrity of financial markets. ISDA is looking to align and integrate the digital documentation and legal data with other standards—for example, the Common Domain Model, which establishes a common digital representation of events and processes that occur during the lifecycle of a trade. Respondents to the survey noted that doing so will allow information within the documentation to flow directly through to trading, operational, and risk management systems in a consistent way, enabling front-to-back automation.
Increased digitization will improve risk management through greater alignment among contracts, processes, and data and will allow for the introduction of real-time regulatory oversight. None of this is possible without the industry-led development of enhanced standards and distribution of these standards in digital formats that allow direct deployment within these technologies. In the letter, the Associations highlight that they will support the members in developing these standards through a series of principles and objectives across standardization, digitization, and distribution, including the following:
- Support the development of common, interoperable industry standard models for financial transactions and processes
- Work with members and relevant authorities to promote alignment among disparate data standards and greater consistency of regulatory requirements across the market
- Promote the adoption of standardized and simplified legal documentation where appropriate in the relevant market
- Explore and pursue the delivery of industry-standard documentation in digital formats
- Support the development of robust legal agreement data models aimed at connecting contractual terms with supporting processes and data
- Work with members and relevant authorities to establish greater legal and regulatory certainty on the use of electronic contracts and signatures
- Distribute new standards on an industry-wide, commercially reasonable basis where possible to support the development and implementation of interoperable and efficient technology solutions
- Establish a robust and inclusive governance framework around the development, operation, and maintenance of any mutualized technology standards
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Common Domain Model, Derivatives, Derivatives, Regtech, Automation, FSB, IOSCO, BCBS, ISDA
Previous ArticleIFSB Report Examines Stability of Islamic Financial Services Sector
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.