ISDA explained its opinion on the standardization and digitization of financial/derivatives contracts and the associated documentation. A recent survey shows that members of ISDA from different business functions supported the ISDA objective of developing standards and digital formats for documentation and other products to support automation. ISDA is planning to make its forthcoming 2020 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions available in a digital format—in line with the priority expressed by members in the survey. ISDA is also looking to align and integrate the digital documentation and legal data with other standards. ISDA, along with several other Associations, has written a letter to FSB, IOSCO, and BCBS to assert their joint commitment to defining and promoting the development of a digital future for financial markets, focused on three core areas: standardization, digitization, and distribution.
The Associations include Association of German Banks, the Australian Financial Markets Association (AFMA), International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the International Islamic Financial Market, the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA), LBMA, and UK Finance. The letter highlights that the adoption of common data and process standards across the industry will allow for the consistent aggregation of global financial data and more comprehensive risk assessment of supervised firms, promoting greater confidence in the integrity of financial markets. ISDA is looking to align and integrate the digital documentation and legal data with other standards—for example, the Common Domain Model, which establishes a common digital representation of events and processes that occur during the lifecycle of a trade. Respondents to the survey noted that doing so will allow information within the documentation to flow directly through to trading, operational, and risk management systems in a consistent way, enabling front-to-back automation.
Increased digitization will improve risk management through greater alignment among contracts, processes, and data and will allow for the introduction of real-time regulatory oversight. None of this is possible without the industry-led development of enhanced standards and distribution of these standards in digital formats that allow direct deployment within these technologies. In the letter, the Associations highlight that they will support the members in developing these standards through a series of principles and objectives across standardization, digitization, and distribution, including the following:
- Support the development of common, interoperable industry standard models for financial transactions and processes
- Work with members and relevant authorities to promote alignment among disparate data standards and greater consistency of regulatory requirements across the market
- Promote the adoption of standardized and simplified legal documentation where appropriate in the relevant market
- Explore and pursue the delivery of industry-standard documentation in digital formats
- Support the development of robust legal agreement data models aimed at connecting contractual terms with supporting processes and data
- Work with members and relevant authorities to establish greater legal and regulatory certainty on the use of electronic contracts and signatures
- Distribute new standards on an industry-wide, commercially reasonable basis where possible to support the development and implementation of interoperable and efficient technology solutions
- Establish a robust and inclusive governance framework around the development, operation, and maintenance of any mutualized technology standards
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Common Domain Model, Derivatives, Derivatives, Regtech, Automation, FSB, IOSCO, BCBS, ISDA
Previous ArticleIFSB Report Examines Stability of Islamic Financial Services Sector
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.