Featured Product

    FSI Note Discusses Challenges Associated with COVID Relief Measures

    August 06, 2020

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These temporary relief measures introduced by governments and banks include public guarantees and payment deferrals to support struggling borrowers. The note highlights that the most consequential challenge for prudential authorities will be how and when to exit from these exceptional regulatory relief measures, particularly if credit risks continue to mount on bank balance sheets.

    The note briefly summarizes key features of the public guarantees and payment deferral schemes, how COVID-affected borrowers that have been granted debt relief are classified under the BCBS prudential guidelines on problem assets, and how such exposures and the related expected credit loss (ECL) provisions are considered in calculating regulatory capital. It then examines the implications of regulatory relief measures on key prudential metrics and outlines the supervisory challenges arising from these relief measures. In view of these challenges, the note describes the following practical steps that prudential authorities can take to enhance their supervisory risk assessments and to support banks’ efforts to reflect credit risk in their reported regulatory measures:

    • Ensure that banks proactively utilize the UTP criterion—independent of public guarantees—to determine the stock of reported nonperforming exposures
    • Assess, under Pillar 2, whether the minimum Pillar 1 credit risk capital requirements under the standardized and internal ratings-based approaches are sufficient in relation to a bank’s stock of nonperforming exposures and other low-quality assets
    • Determine the cumulative amount and realizability of the “interest accrued but not collected” line item associated with borrowers granted payment deferrals
    • Provide guidance to banks on how to reflect the impact of partial guarantees that may be provided to incentivize lending to affected borrowers, for the purpose of calculating risk-based capital requirements
    • Encourage banks to consider using, where appropriate, other forms of credit modifications, such as principal haircuts—rather than relying solely on payment deferrals that must be repaid—particularly for borrowers that have already been identified as unlikely to pay their rescheduled debts

    The note highlights that, as long as the fallout from the pandemic continues, these temporary relief measures are likely to remain in the prudential framework, while credit risks continue to mount on bank balance sheets. This dichotomy poses risks to financial stability, particularly if credit losses materialize after the payment holiday period ends and the regulatory relief measures can no longer prevent heightened credit risks from being fully reflected in a bank’s reported level of non-performing exposures and common equity tier 1 risk-based capital (CET1 RBC) ratio, both of which are widely used benchmarks to assess the health of banks and national financial systems. The conclusion is that, going forward, the most consequential challenge for prudential authorities will be how and when to exit from these exceptional regulatory relief measures. Acting too early may be counterproductive and could exacerbate a credit crunch, while waiting too late may undermine confidence in the regulatory regime and threaten systemic stability. As with all difficult decisions in prudential supervision, making the right calls, at the right time will involve the use of sound judgment; the judgments made, particularly in these unprecedented times, can have a ripple effect on the wheels that grease the global economy

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, COVID-19, Loan Guarantee, Payment Deferrals, Credit Risk, Regulatory Capital, ECL, NPE, Basel, FSI, BIS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    EC Delegated Regulation on Specialized Lending Exposures Under CRR

    EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.

    April 14, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Consults on Minimum Qualifying Rate for Uninsured Mortgages

    OSFI is proposing new minimum qualifying rate for uninsured mortgages under the Guideline B-20.

    April 13, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Updates List of Supervised Entities in EU in April 2021

    ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities amounting to 115 as of the March 01, 2021 cut-off date.

    April 12, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Issues Letter on ICAAP Submission and Internal Audit of BCAR

    OSFI issued a letter to confirm that a formal Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) submission is not required in 2021.

    April 12, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Agrees to Prolong Scheme to Support NPL Reduction at Greek Banks

    EC has approved the prolongation of an existing Greek scheme aiming to support the reduction of nonperforming loans, or NPLs, of Greek banks on the basis that it remains free of any State aid.

    April 09, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Study Examines Internal Model Market and Credit Risks Under SII

    EIOPA published a report presenting the results of its yearly study on the internal modeling of market and credit risks under the Solvency II Directive, also known as SII.

    April 09, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Issues Notification Templates for STS Synthetic Securitizations

    ESMA published the interim simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) notification templates for synthetic securitizations, post the recent amendments to the Securitization Regulation.

    April 09, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Erratum for Phase 2 Package of Reporting Framework 3.0

    EBA published an erratum for the technical package on phase 2 of the reporting framework 3.0.

    April 08, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Updates Lists of Entities for Use in Capital Calculations under SA

    EBA published an erratum for the technical package on phase 2 of the reporting framework 3.0.

    April 08, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Automate Bank Stock Adjustment Using Call Report Data

    FED published a proposal to automate non-merger-related adjustments to member banks' subscriptions to Federal Reserve Bank capital stock.

    April 08, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6835