OFR published a working paper that examines the effects of Volcker rule on corporate bond trading. The paper examines the impact of the Volcker rule, which bans proprietary trading by commercial banks and their affiliates, with some exceptions. The paper finds evidence that the rule has increased the cost of liquidity provided by firms it covers, but not decreased the firms’ exposure to liquidity risk. It also finds that the rule has decreased the market share of covered firms. Customers appear to be trading more with non-bank dealers, who are exempt from the Volcker rule, but cannot borrow at the discount window of FED.
The study used the underwriting exemption of the Volcker rule combined with the regulatory TRACE dataset to identify the Volcker rule’s impact on bank holding company affiliated dealers’ trading in the corporate bond market. This identification strategy separates out the effects of market liquidity and other contemporaneous changes in financial regulation. Using regulatory data on secondary market transactions in corporate bonds, the authors classify round-trip trades of different duration completed by all dealers. The analysis in this paper makes use of three datasets to obtain information on corporate bond transactions, bond characteristics, and dealer type, including transaction data and round-trip trades, bond characteristics and underwriter information, and Volcker-covered status of dealers. Using a novel within-dealer, within-security identiﬁcation strategy, the paper examines intended and unintended eﬀects of the Volcker rule on covered ﬁrms’ corporate bond trading, using dealer-identiﬁed regulatory data. The underwriting exemption was used to isolate the Volcker rule’s eﬀects separate from other post-crisis changes in bank regulation and broader trends in market liquidity.
A reduction of the riskiness of covered dealer trades in this market was one of the intended effects of the Volcker rule. The paper found no evidence of the rule’s intended reduction in the riskiness of covered ﬁrms’ trading in corporate bonds. The markups significantly increased for trades by covered dealers, even after controlling for other contemporaneous effects. This increase in costs of 20 to 45 basis points per round-trip trade represents a statistically and economically significant change in corporate bond market liquidity. After controlling for the 16-month transition period immediately following the implementation of the rule, these effects remain persistent. It was further found that covered dealers are losing corporate bond market share to non-bank dealers as a result of the Volcker rule. Overall, the paper suggests that the rule in its current form is not reducing dealer risk-taking in corporate bonds and may be increasing the spreads charged by covered dealers. The results of this study, however, cannot be extrapolated to the effects of the rule on trading in other asset classes.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Volcker Rule, Covered Bonds, Proprietary Trading, Corporate Bond, OFR
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.