EBA published its advice to EC on the implementation of Basel III in EU. The advice includes a quantitative analysis of the estimated impact of Basel III based on data from 189 banks and offers a set of policy recommendations. This work is in response to the call for advice from EC. EBA welcomed improvements introduced in the final Basel III package, including the introduction of a higher degree of risk-sensitivity in the standardized approaches to measure credit and operational risks and the constraints to internal modeling by banks where undue variability of model outcomes was observed in the past. Overall, these reforms are expected to increase financial stability while allowing the continued use of risk-sensitive approaches. EBA also published letter from Olivier Guersent, Director General FISMA, regarding the call for advice on the final elements of the Basel III framework.
The impact assessment shows that the full implementation of Basel III, under conservative assumptions, will increase the minimum capital requirement by 24.4% on an average. This increase in capital requirements will imply an aggregate shortfall in total capital of about EUR 135.1 billion (EUR 91.1 billion in terms of common equity tier 1). The majority of the capital impact occurs on large globally active banks. The impact on medium-size banks is limited to 11.3% in terms of minimum capital requirement, leading to a shortfall of EUR 0.9 billion, and the impact on small banks is limited to to 5.5% in terms of the minimum capital requirement, with a EUR 0.1 billion shortfall. EBA supports full implementation of the final Basel III standards, which will contribute to the credibility of the banking sector in EU and ensure a well-functioning global banking market. The analysis includes Pillar 2 requirements and the full set of combined buffer requirements in the calculation of banks' minimum required capital and assumes that these requirements remain at current levels.
EBA published four policy advice reports that provide detailed policy recommendations for a number of areas of the Basel III framework, including the following:
- In the area of credit risk—All the newly agreed revisions should be implemented in EU, maintaining a prudential framework based on external ratings and the loan-splitting approach to exposures secured by real estate. The report also recommends that no EU-specific supporting factors for small and medium-size enterprises (SME) and infrastructure lending exposures are retained.
- In the area of securities financing transactions—All the newly agreed revisions should be implemented in EU, except for the minimum haircuts floor framework where EBA believes further analysis is needed.
- In the area of operational risk—The new standardized approach should be implemented. The standardized approach should be based on the institution-specific historical loss component for larger institutions to maintain a risk-sensitive approach. For the same reason, smaller institutions may be allowed to also use the historical loss component on a case-by-case basis. EBA advises EC to consider a phase-in period for the standardized approach.
- Output floor—It should be introduced and, where applicable, should be used to compute all capital requirements, including EU-specific requirements such as the systemic risk buffer. The output floor should be applied at all levels of consolidation.
BCBS has recently made targeted revisions to the fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB) and these revisions have not been assessed in this report. In line with the request from EC, EBA will publish its advice on the implementation of the finalized FRTB and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) frameworks, along with an analysis of the macroeconomic impact of the final Basel III framework later this year. In this context, EBA acknowledges receipt of an additional request for technical advice from EC on further aspects of the final Basel III framework.
- Press Release
- Impact Assessment
- Policy Advice—Credit Risk (PDF)
- Policy Advice—SFTs (PDF)
- Policy Advice—Operational Risk (PDF)
- Policy Advice—Output Floor (PDF)
- Call for Advice and Related Documents
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel III, Impact Assessment, Basel III Finalization, Proportionality, Call for Advice, Minimum Capital Requirements, Basel III Monitoring, Recommendations, EC, EBA
Previous ArticleBOT and SBV Sign MoUs to Promote Regulatory and Fintech Cooperation
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.