EBA published its advice to EC on the implementation of Basel III in EU. The advice includes a quantitative analysis of the estimated impact of Basel III based on data from 189 banks and offers a set of policy recommendations. This work is in response to the call for advice from EC. EBA welcomed improvements introduced in the final Basel III package, including the introduction of a higher degree of risk-sensitivity in the standardized approaches to measure credit and operational risks and the constraints to internal modeling by banks where undue variability of model outcomes was observed in the past. Overall, these reforms are expected to increase financial stability while allowing the continued use of risk-sensitive approaches. EBA also published letter from Olivier Guersent, Director General FISMA, regarding the call for advice on the final elements of the Basel III framework.
The impact assessment shows that the full implementation of Basel III, under conservative assumptions, will increase the minimum capital requirement by 24.4% on an average. This increase in capital requirements will imply an aggregate shortfall in total capital of about EUR 135.1 billion (EUR 91.1 billion in terms of common equity tier 1). The majority of the capital impact occurs on large globally active banks. The impact on medium-size banks is limited to 11.3% in terms of minimum capital requirement, leading to a shortfall of EUR 0.9 billion, and the impact on small banks is limited to to 5.5% in terms of the minimum capital requirement, with a EUR 0.1 billion shortfall. EBA supports full implementation of the final Basel III standards, which will contribute to the credibility of the banking sector in EU and ensure a well-functioning global banking market. The analysis includes Pillar 2 requirements and the full set of combined buffer requirements in the calculation of banks' minimum required capital and assumes that these requirements remain at current levels.
EBA published four policy advice reports that provide detailed policy recommendations for a number of areas of the Basel III framework, including the following:
- In the area of credit risk—All the newly agreed revisions should be implemented in EU, maintaining a prudential framework based on external ratings and the loan-splitting approach to exposures secured by real estate. The report also recommends that no EU-specific supporting factors for small and medium-size enterprises (SME) and infrastructure lending exposures are retained.
- In the area of securities financing transactions—All the newly agreed revisions should be implemented in EU, except for the minimum haircuts floor framework where EBA believes further analysis is needed.
- In the area of operational risk—The new standardized approach should be implemented. The standardized approach should be based on the institution-specific historical loss component for larger institutions to maintain a risk-sensitive approach. For the same reason, smaller institutions may be allowed to also use the historical loss component on a case-by-case basis. EBA advises EC to consider a phase-in period for the standardized approach.
- Output floor—It should be introduced and, where applicable, should be used to compute all capital requirements, including EU-specific requirements such as the systemic risk buffer. The output floor should be applied at all levels of consolidation.
BCBS has recently made targeted revisions to the fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB) and these revisions have not been assessed in this report. In line with the request from EC, EBA will publish its advice on the implementation of the finalized FRTB and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) frameworks, along with an analysis of the macroeconomic impact of the final Basel III framework later this year. In this context, EBA acknowledges receipt of an additional request for technical advice from EC on further aspects of the final Basel III framework.
- Press Release
- Impact Assessment
- Policy Advice—Credit Risk (PDF)
- Policy Advice—SFTs (PDF)
- Policy Advice—Operational Risk (PDF)
- Policy Advice—Output Floor (PDF)
- Call for Advice and Related Documents
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel III, Impact Assessment, Basel III Finalization, Proportionality, Call for Advice, Minimum Capital Requirements, Basel III Monitoring, Recommendations, EC, EBA
Previous ArticleCFTC Adopts Interim Rule on Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.