PRA to Extend Temporary High Balance Coverage Amid COVID Crisis
PRA published the policy statement PS19/20 on the final policy for extending coverage under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for Temporary High Balance. PS19/20 amends the Depositor Protection Part of the PRA Rulebook (Appendix 1) and the Statement of Policy on the Deposit Guarantee Scheme (Appendix 2). PS19/20 also contains feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP6/20 on extending Temporary High Balance coverage. In CP6/20, PRA had proposed to increase the Temporary High Balance coverage period from six months to twelve months up until, and including, January 31, 2021. PRA highlights that responses to CP6/20 did not raise issues that would lead to any changes to the proposal. Coverage for Temporary High Balance will revert to six months, from February 01, 2021. The rule change and updated Statement of Policy will become effective on August 06, 2020.
The Temporary High Balance rules of PRA extend FSCS coverage from GBP 85,000 to GBP 1 million for a period of six months from the point of deposit for certain qualifying life events, including deposits in preparation for the purchase and proceeds from the sale of residential properties, benefits payable on death, and life assurance payouts. The length of coverage for each Temporary High Balance would be determined by reference to the date on which a Temporary High Balance is credited to a depositor’s account, or the first date on which the Temporary High Balance becomes legally transferable to the depositor, whichever is later. The proposals were aimed to mitigate the consumer protection issues caused by the impact of COVID-19 on residential property and investment markets and on access to banking services, for some depositors.
PS19/20 is relevant to retail financial consumers that are, or may become, Temporary High Balance depositors. PS19/20 is also relevant to FSCS and to all authorized deposit takers. PS19/20 has been designed in the context of withdrawal of UK from EU and entry into the transition period, during which time UK remains subject to European law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework at the end of the transition period, including those arising once any new arrangements with EU take effect. PRA has assessed that the policy would not need to be amended under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Related Links
Effective Date: August 06, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, FSCS, PRA Rulebook, Deposit Guarantee Scheme, Residential Property, Credit Risk, CP6/20, PS19/20, Temporary High Balance Coverage, PRA
Featured Experts
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous Article
FSI Studies Involvement of Central Banks in Financial OversightRelated Articles
APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
