FED is requesting public comments on a corporate governance proposal to enhance the effectiveness of boards of directors and on a proposal to better align its rating system for large financial institutions with the post-crisis supervisory program for these firms. Comments will be accepted for 60 days.
The proposal on corporate governance would refocus the FED's supervisory expectations for the largest firms' boards of directors on their core responsibilities, which will promote the safety and soundness of the firms. Boards' core responsibilities include oversight of the types and levels of risk a firm may take and aligning the firm's business strategy with those risk decisions. Additionally, the proposal would reduce unnecessary burden for the boards of smaller institutions. The corporate governance proposal is made up of three parts and it:
Identifies the attributes of effective boards of directors, such as setting a clear and consistent strategic direction for the firm, supporting independent risk management, and holding the management of the firm accountable (for the largest institutions, FED supervisors would use these attributes to inform their evaluation of a firm's governance and controls)
Clarifies that, for all supervised firms, most supervisory findings should be communicated to the firm's senior management for corrective action, rather than to its board of directors
Identifies existing supervisory expectations for boards of directors that could be eliminated or revised
The proposal on the rating system for large financial institutions system incorporates the regulatory and supervisory changes made by FED since 2012, which focus on capital, liquidity, and the effectiveness of governance and controls, including firms' compliance with laws and regulations. The current supervisory program for the largest firms was introduced in 2012 and sets higher standards to lower the probability of a firm's failure or material distress and to reduce risks to the U.S. financial stability. The proposed changes to the rating Supervisors would assess and assign confidential ratings in each of these categories. The proposed rating system would only apply to large financial institutions, such as domestic bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies with USD 50 billion or more in total consolidated assets as well as the intermediate holding companies of foreign banking organizations operating in the United States. Consistent with existing practice, the new rating system would not apply to insurance companies supervised by the Board. Firms with less than USD 50 billion in consolidated assets, including community banks, would continue to use the current rating system, which reflects long-standing supervisory practices for those firms.
Comment Due Date: October 01, 2017
Keywords: Americas, United States of America, Banking, Corporate Governance, Rating System, FED
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.
ECB finalized guidance on the way it expects banks to prudently manage and transparently disclose climate and other environmental risks under the current prudential rules.
BCBS published a technical amendment to the capital treatment of securitizations of non-performing loans by banks.
BoE announced that the Data and Statistics Division is planning to move collection of statistical data to the BoE Electronic Data Submission (BEEDS) portal.
APRA published the updated reporting standards and guidance for the collection of Economic and Financial Statistics (EFS), following a consultation process. Also published was a response letter to the feedback received on the proposal for amending the EFS reporting standards and guidance.
EC is consulting on a draft delegated regulation to supplement the Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable.
The IFRS Foundation published material highlighting the ways in which existing requirements in IFRS standards require companies to consider climate-related matters when their effect is material to the financial statements.
FSB published a progress report on the implementation of reforms to major interest rate benchmarks, including the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark.