APRA published its submission to the Productivity Commission's draft report examining the efficiency and competitiveness of superannuation system in Australia. The Productivity Commission has acknowledged the importance of superannuation system in Australia and the substantial value that has been, and continues to be, delivered to fund members.
APRA welcomed the draft report and agrees with a number of the Productivity Commission findings and the direction of many, but not all, of the recommendations in the draft report. The APRA submission sets out the perspective of APRA on the following key areas addressed in the draft report:
- Activities of APRA related to member outcomes
- Management of implementation
- Role of APRA and the regulatory architecture
- Improving the quality of superannuation data
APRA is supportive of the focus placed by the Productivity Commission on member outcomes, which aligns closely with the current strategy of APRA for the superannuation industry. The superannuation prudential framework of APRA is less mature, compared to the other industries that APRA regulates. The industry has made substantial progress in implementing the new prudential standards over the last five years, which has translated into improved industry practices. However, the progress is somewhat variable, with some trustees making significant strides toward better practice and others showing (in some cases considerable) room for improvement. Similarly, the quality of the outcomes being provided for members varies widely across the industry. While the regulatory framework has been improved by recent legislative reforms, the continued absence of critical powers in superannuation for APRA inhibits its ability to take timely and proactive action.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Superannuation, Prudential Framework, Post-Implementation Review, Productivity Commission, APRA
Previous ArticleECB Publishes Version 1.1 of AnaCredit Validation Checks
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).