CBIRC launched a consultation on the draft interim measures for the classification of financial asset risks of commercial banks in China. The comment period for this consultation ends on May 31, 2019. The Interim Measures extend the risk classification from loans to all financial assets that bear credit risk and propose non-credit assets with credit impairment as the core classification requirement, especially for the classification of asset management products.
Compared with the current "Guidelines" on asset risk classification, the "Interim Measures" expand the scope of asset risk classification, propose a new core definition of risk classification, emphasize the debtor-centered classification concept, clearly define the number of overdue days as an objective indicator of risk classification, and provide risk classification requirements for restructuring assets. Additionally, the "Interim Measures" put forward systematic requirements for commercial banks to strengthen risk classification management and clarify the relevant requirements for supervision and management.
As per the new measures, commercial banks are required to improve the risk classification governance structure, formulate risk classification management systems, clarify classification methods, processes and frequencies, develop and improve information systems, and strengthen monitoring and analysis, information disclosure, and document management. After the implementation of the Interim Measures, claims overdue for more than 90 days, even if the mortgage guarantee is sufficient, should be classified as bad. Considering the severity of the risks reflected by the non-retail debtor overdue for more than 90 days, the bank should categorize its debt as bad if the debtor’s debt overdue for more than 90 days in all banks’ debts has exceeded 5%. In addition, if loans are overdue for more than 270 days, they should be classified as at least suspicious. If overdue for more than 360 days, they should be classified as loss.
As per the CBIRC notification, credit risk is the most important risk faced by the banking industry in China and a sound risk classification system is the prerequisite for effective prevention and control of credit risk. These measures replace the existing guidelines on this topic while drawing on the latest international requirements and keeping in mind the domestic regulatory practices. These measures are also cognizant of the BCBS guidelines, from 2017, for careful handling of assets (Definitions of Adverse Exposure and Regulatory Tolerance); these BCBS guidelines clarified the criteria and classification requirements for non-performing assets and restructured assets to enhance the consistency of the global banking asset risk classification criteria.
Related Links (in Chinese)
Comment Due Date: May 31, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, China, Banking, Credit Risk, NPLs, Interim Measures, Classification of Impairments, 90 Days Overdue, Asset Risk Classification, CBIRC
Previous ArticleAPRA Consults on Prudential Standard for the Superannuation Entities
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).