Featured Product

    ISDA Urges EU to Revise CRR to Address Procyclicality Amid Stress

    April 27, 2020

    ISDA published a statement urging European authorities toward a more effective course of action to deal with the procyclicality that causes market risk capital requirements to balloon during a period of stress. To ease the impact of recent market volatility, ECB has temporarily reduced the qualitative market risk multiplier, which is not directly linked to the number of back-testing exceptions that are causing the problem. ISDA, however, states that a more effective course of action would be to revise the Capital Requirements Regulation in EU to bring it in line with the Basel Committee standards by giving national competent authorities the flexibility to take appropriate action when exceptions are not caused by deficiencies in the model. This would allow national authorities to intervene where necessary to temporarily suspend the automatic effects of the multiplier until the extreme effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are over.

    Regulators have typically tried to avoid putting in place measures that are explicitly procyclical, but the recent bout of COVID-related volatility is resulting in a significant increase in trading book capital requirements that could impede the ability of banks to deploy capital in support of the economy. The issue centers on the elevated number of value-at-risk (VaR) back-testing exceptions that banks are experiencing, caused by severe market volatility due to the pandemic. Under the current regime introduced as part of Basel 2.5, banks are required to add a multiplier to their capital calculations if actual or hypothetical P&L over the course of a single trading day exceeds VaR estimates more than four times in a year—with the multiplier increasing as the number of exceptions continues to climb. However, this measure has proved to be highly procyclical. The multiplier is meant to compensate for model deficiencies, but extreme volatility in recent weeks has put VaR models under pressure, resulting in a higher number of exceptions. This means banks are having to apply multipliers because of market volatility rather than shortcomings in their models, causing market risk capital requirements to balloon during a period of stress.

    All of this is happening at a time when regulators are taking measures to encourage banks to use excess capital and liquidity to continue to provide intermediation services and support the economy. The procyclical nature of the VaR multiplier could end up having the opposite effect, putting pressure on capital requirements. Regulators in CanadaSwitzerland, and the UK have recognized this issue and have taken action to smooth the volatility-induced procyclical effect of the multiplier. For example, Swiss regulators have opted to freeze the multiplier used by banks as of February 1 until July 1. ECB has also looked to address the problem and announced that it is temporarily reducing the "qualitative market risk multiplier," a measure set by supervisors that is intended to address weaknesses in a bank’s risk management, controls, and governance framework. While this action is welcome, ISDA would urge the European authorities to go further. The qualitative multiplier indirectly linked to the number of back-testing exceptions causing the problem. It is also individual to each bank, meaning the potential level of relief could differ between firms and be limited in some cases.

    Therefore, ISDA believes that a more effective course of action would be to revise the Capital Requirements Regulation in EU to bring it in line with the Basel Committee standards by giving national competent authorities the flexibility to take appropriate action when exceptions are not caused by deficiencies in the model. This would allow national authorities to intervene where necessary to temporarily suspend the automatic effects of the multiplier until the extreme effects of the COVID-19 outbreak are over. It is important that banks have sufficient capital to weather the current crisis and the more than EUR 2 trillion in tier 1 capital that internationally active banks have added to their balance sheets since 2011 means they are more resilient to stress. However, the procyclical market risk capital measures give banks less leeway to act as intermediaries, hindering firms from accessing the financing and risk management services they need.

     

    Related Link: Statement

    Keywords: International, Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Value-at-Risk, CRR, Procyclicality, Basel, Market Risk, Regulatory Capital, Backtesting Exception, ISDA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA Enhances Loan Guarantee Scheme to Alleviate Pressure on SMEs

    HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.

    February 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Sets Out Plan to Transform Data Collection from Financial Sector

    BoE has set out a three-phased plan to transform data collection from the UK financial sector over the next decade.

    February 23, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Issues Updates on Technology Initiatives on Cross-Border Payments

    BIS recently made a couple of announcements with respect to the planned and ongoing work in the area of financial technology.

    February 23, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESRB Updates List of Macro-Prudential Measures in February 2021

    ESRB updated the list of national macro-prudential measures applied by each member state in the European Economic Area.

    February 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Survey Shows Positive COVID Impact on Outsourced Banking Services

    BoE has set out results of a survey on the impact of COVID-19 events on the use of machine learning and data science.

    February 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Issues Opinion on Proposal to Regulate Crypto-Asset Markets in EU

    In response to a request from the European Council and Parliament, ECB published an opinion on the proposed regulation on markets in crypto-assets.

    February 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Announces Aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility for Banks

    APRA announced the updated aggregate amounts for the 2021 Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF) established between the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and certain locally incorporated authorized deposit-taking institutions that are subject to the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR).

    February 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB and UK Authorities Agree on Post-Brexit Supervisory Cooperation

    ECB published supervisory Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) with UK as well as other European and non-European authorities.

    February 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Outlines Strategic Supervisory Priorities for Insurance Sector

    EIOPA identified business model sustainability and adequate product design as the two EU-wide strategic supervisory priorities.

    February 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies to Revise FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051 Reports

    After considering comments received on the November 2020 proposal, US Agencies (FDIC, FED and OCC) are proceeding with the proposed revisions to the reporting forms and instructions for Call Reports FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051.

    February 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6618