ECB published an article that explains the key messages of ECB on the EC proposals that important for macro-prudential regulation and policy. The EC proposals for the reform of EU banking rules aim to complete the post-crisis reform agenda and to address shortcomings in the current regulatory framework, notably in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV). ECB considers that the ongoing discussions on the CRR and CRD IV package provide an opportunity to make targeted changes to the macro-prudential toolkit to make it more efficient and consistent.
A comprehensive review of the macro-prudential framework is needed to integrate lessons learned on the use of tools and to reflect the changes in the institutional setup. The ongoing discussions on the banking package provide an opportunity for targeted changes to the macro-prudential toolkit, before a broader review is conducted in the medium term. The article focuses on possible targeted changes to the existing toolkit to enhance the effectiveness of the toolkit; it also proposes avenues to be considered in the context of a broader review to be conducted in the medium term. In the absence of a comprehensive review of the EU macro-prudential framework in the short term, targeted changes should be introduced in the context of the CRR and CRD IV review.
Once implemented, the changes to CRR and CRD IV will strengthen the regulatory architecture in the EU, thus contributing to the reduction of risks in the banking sector and paving the way for commensurate progress in completing the banking union. As part of its contribution to the EC consultation on the macro-prudential review, ECB called for the following:
- The delineation of the roles and responsibilities of macro- and micro-prudential authorities, including restriction on the use of Pillar 2 solely for micro-prudential purposes and strictly on an institution-by-institution basis
- The elimination of overlaps among instruments and greater flexibility in the capital buffer framework
- The streamlining of activation procedures, where these do not add value in terms of safeguarding the Single Market
- Provision of a review clause to allow for further adjustments in the future
Related Link: ECB Article
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Macro-prudential Framework, CRR/CRD, Pillar 2, Capital Buffers, ECB
Previous ArticleCBE Publishes Q&A on the Pre-Implementation of IFRS 9
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.