The SRB Chair Elke König published an article on the completion of Banking Union. In the article, she emphasized that we should take a step back and identify further elements, which impede the completion of a full-fledged Banking Union. Once the Banking Union is completed, there is little reason for ring-fencing adds Elke König.
The Single Supervisory Mechanism tasked with reducing the occurrence of crises ex-ante and the Single Resolution Mechanism equipped with common rules for the orderly wind-down of a failing bank ex-post have proven to be two important pillars of Banking Union. The missing third pillar, a common European Deposit Insurance Scheme with appropriate safeguards is a prerequisite for the completion of the Banking Union, as it would harmonize the level of depositor protection in all member states. However, efforts are also needed in other domains. For instance, the divergence of national insolvency laws is a major obstacle toward a full-fledged Banking Union. In the current system, the counterfactual of no-creditor-worse off (NCWO) might produce different results in different countries, depending on the national insolvency regime, and thus negatively impact on the orderly wind-down of a bank. SRB, therefore, encourages legislators to harmonize national insolvency laws. This harmonization would facilitate resolution planning for cross-border banking groups within the Banking Union.
While harmonized rules certainly help to ensure effective supervision and resolution, the consistent enforcement of these rules and close coordination and cooperation among authorities are equally decisive for the functioning of the Banking Union. Hence, the cooperation of ECB and SRB must be improved even further and the updated Memorandum of Understanding will help in this regard. Moreover, the cooperation and monitoring between the individual national competent and resolution authorities and their interaction at the European level requires further intensified efforts. Thus, the trust of national authorities in the effectiveness of the European supervisory and resolution regime is expected to be considerably strengthened. Overcoming the outlined obstacles to the fragmentation of the Banking Union can be a major contributor to financial stability, enhance resolvability, and depositor protection and help build trust and confidence in the functioning of the Banking Union among the different national authorities.
Related Link: Article
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Union, SSM, Ring Fencing, SRB
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published guidelines on loan origination and monitoring, which bring together prudential standards and consumer protection obligations, along with the anti-money laundering and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations.
EBA published a consultation paper on the draft amended regulatory technical standards on own funds and eligible liabilities.
EBA published a report on convergence of supervisory practices in 2019.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.