PRA has issued a follow-up note for PRA-regulated insurers with regard to the PRA letter on its position regarding IFRS 9, capital requirements for firms, and loan covenants. On March 26, 2020, Sam Woods of PRA issued this letter to Chief Executive Officers of UK banks. Since then, some insurance firms have sought clarification on how the points in that letter should be interpreted in context of their internal assessments of loan creditworthiness and treatment of unrated assets.
The note highlights that the expectations of PRA for insurers' use of unrated assets have been set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/17) on Illiquid, unrated assets under Solvency II, which was updated on April 02, 2020. Paragraphs 2.8A to 2.8L of the SS3/17 set out relevant expectations regarding risk identification and application of judgments and methodologies. The accompanying policy statement (PS9/20) on income-producing real estate loans and internal credit assessments for illiquid, unrated assets further refers to the published measures to alleviate operational burdens arising due to the COVID-19 outbreak. In this context, while Sam Woods’ letter does not address insurers’ internal credit ratings, some points in the letter can be considered to have applicability beyond the insurers that are using IFRS 9 to account for financial instruments.
Insurers are advised to read the letter in its entirety. Paragraph 5 of the Annex to the letter includes further examples of considerations that insurance firms may find helpful when forming their judgments on the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on their internal credit assessments. Similarly, regarding breaches to loan covenants arising directly as a result of COVID-19, the letter further noted that in the current uncertain environment such breaches may not necessarily be reflective of long-term credit risk. Nevertheless, it should be noted that firms will need to use their judgment to determine which covenant breaches do reflect increased credit risk and which do not. As set out in the letter, it remains important that firms’ assessments of covenant breaches fully take into account the differences between normal covenant breaches and those that might occur directly because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kewywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, COVID-19, IFRS 9, Capital Requirements, Solvency II, Credit Risk, Loan Convenant, Credit Ratings, Financial Instruments, PRA
Previous ArticleHKMA Publishes Results of Survey on Interest Rate Benchmark Reforms
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the March 31, 2020 interim final rule that provides a five-year transition period for the impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology on regulatory capital.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.
SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.