PRA has issued a follow-up note for PRA-regulated insurers with regard to the PRA letter on its position regarding IFRS 9, capital requirements for firms, and loan covenants. On March 26, 2020, Sam Woods of PRA issued this letter to Chief Executive Officers of UK banks. Since then, some insurance firms have sought clarification on how the points in that letter should be interpreted in context of their internal assessments of loan creditworthiness and treatment of unrated assets.
The note highlights that the expectations of PRA for insurers' use of unrated assets have been set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/17) on Illiquid, unrated assets under Solvency II, which was updated on April 02, 2020. Paragraphs 2.8A to 2.8L of the SS3/17 set out relevant expectations regarding risk identification and application of judgments and methodologies. The accompanying policy statement (PS9/20) on income-producing real estate loans and internal credit assessments for illiquid, unrated assets further refers to the published measures to alleviate operational burdens arising due to the COVID-19 outbreak. In this context, while Sam Woods’ letter does not address insurers’ internal credit ratings, some points in the letter can be considered to have applicability beyond the insurers that are using IFRS 9 to account for financial instruments.
Insurers are advised to read the letter in its entirety. Paragraph 5 of the Annex to the letter includes further examples of considerations that insurance firms may find helpful when forming their judgments on the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on their internal credit assessments. Similarly, regarding breaches to loan covenants arising directly as a result of COVID-19, the letter further noted that in the current uncertain environment such breaches may not necessarily be reflective of long-term credit risk. Nevertheless, it should be noted that firms will need to use their judgment to determine which covenant breaches do reflect increased credit risk and which do not. As set out in the letter, it remains important that firms’ assessments of covenant breaches fully take into account the differences between normal covenant breaches and those that might occur directly because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kewywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, COVID-19, IFRS 9, Capital Requirements, Solvency II, Credit Risk, Loan Convenant, Credit Ratings, Financial Instruments, PRA
Previous ArticleHKMA Publishes Results of Survey on Interest Rate Benchmark Reforms
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.