PRA Further Clarifies Position on IFRS9 and Loan Covenant Requirements
PRA has issued a follow-up note for PRA-regulated insurers with regard to the PRA letter on its position regarding IFRS 9, capital requirements for firms, and loan covenants. On March 26, 2020, Sam Woods of PRA issued this letter to Chief Executive Officers of UK banks. Since then, some insurance firms have sought clarification on how the points in that letter should be interpreted in context of their internal assessments of loan creditworthiness and treatment of unrated assets.
The note highlights that the expectations of PRA for insurers' use of unrated assets have been set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/17) on Illiquid, unrated assets under Solvency II, which was updated on April 02, 2020. Paragraphs 2.8A to 2.8L of the SS3/17 set out relevant expectations regarding risk identification and application of judgments and methodologies. The accompanying policy statement (PS9/20) on income-producing real estate loans and internal credit assessments for illiquid, unrated assets further refers to the published measures to alleviate operational burdens arising due to the COVID-19 outbreak. In this context, while Sam Woods’ letter does not address insurers’ internal credit ratings, some points in the letter can be considered to have applicability beyond the insurers that are using IFRS 9 to account for financial instruments.
Insurers are advised to read the letter in its entirety. Paragraph 5 of the Annex to the letter includes further examples of considerations that insurance firms may find helpful when forming their judgments on the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on their internal credit assessments. Similarly, regarding breaches to loan covenants arising directly as a result of COVID-19, the letter further noted that in the current uncertain environment such breaches may not necessarily be reflective of long-term credit risk. Nevertheless, it should be noted that firms will need to use their judgment to determine which covenant breaches do reflect increased credit risk and which do not. As set out in the letter, it remains important that firms’ assessments of covenant breaches fully take into account the differences between normal covenant breaches and those that might occur directly because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Related Links
Kewywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, COVID-19, IFRS 9, Capital Requirements, Solvency II, Credit Risk, Loan Convenant, Credit Ratings, Financial Instruments, PRA
Featured Experts
Metin Epözdemir
Metin Epözdemir helps European and African banks with design and implementation of credit risk, stress testing, capital management, and credit loss accounting solutions.
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Masha Muzyka
CECL, IFRS 9, and IFRS 17 expert; credit risk and insurance risk specialist; strategic planning and credit analytics solutions consultant
Previous Article
HKMA Publishes Results of Survey on Interest Rate Benchmark ReformsRelated Articles
BIS Innovation Hub Sets Out Work Program for 2021
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
EC Plans to Consult on Crisis Management and EDIS Framework Revisions
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA Finalizes Remuneration Standards for Investment Firms in EU
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
ECA Recommends Actions to Enhance Resolution Planning for Banks
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE Publishes Key Elements of the 2021 Stress Testing for Banks in UK
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA Proposes Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB Publishes Work Program for 2021
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA Issues Update on Move to New Data Collection Platform
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank Publishes Derivation Rules for Reporting by Banks
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED Revises Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements for Banks
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
