HKMA published the results of a survey intended to assess progress of banking sector in preparing for the transition to alternative reference rates. The survey on the interest rate benchmark reforms in Hong Kong was launched in November 2019. Results of the survey show that nearly one-third of London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)-linked assets and liabilities and almost half of the derivatives contracts referencing LIBOR would mature after the end of 2021 and do not have adequate fallback provisions. Overall, the derivatives contracts referencing LIBOR amounted to HKD 35 trillion in notional value at the end of September 2019.
The survey indicates that new issuance and trading volume of products referencing alternative reference rates continued to increase. In Hong Kong, the working group on alternative reference rates, formed under the Treasury Markets Association, has been following up on issues that need to be addressed locally. The Treasury Markets Association also developed a dedicated web page containing a collection of useful information on benchmark reform and transition to alternative reference rates. HKMA, in consultation with the Treasury Markets Association, will consider providing more assistance to the banking industry in overcoming the following identified challenges:
- No standard and consistent fallback language existed in the industry for adoption by authorized institutions and other market participants in their existing contracts referencing LIBOR.
- The liquidity for products referencing alternative reference rates was found to be comparatively low.
- No well-established term structure was available for alternative reference rates.
- Limited guidance was available to assist smaller institutions in preparing for the transition.
- Authorized institutions needed to implement significant changes to their information technology systems, internal models, and processes within a short timeframe to cater for the transition to alternative reference rates.
- Certain types of financial contracts referencing LIBOR were difficult, if not impossible, for authorized institutions to renegotiate with their customers or counterparties.
- Authorized Institutions might face conduct risk when dealing with their customers along the transition to alternative reference rates.
- Awareness of the benchmark reform and the need for transition to alternative reference rates were comparatively low among non-authorized institutions customers and counterparties.
- It was unclear whether and, if so, how the transition to alternative reference rates would affect authorized institutions in respect of taxation, accounting, and regulatory framework.
- The status of Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (HIBOR) vis-à-vis Hong Kong Dollar Overnight Index Average (HONIA) as the local interest rate benchmark over a longer term was uncertain.
Outside of Hong Kong, FCA had issued a statement, in March, highlighting that the central assumption that firms cannot rely on LIBOR being published after the end of 2021 did not change, notwithstanding the COVID-19 outbreak. Certain organizations leading the transition to alternative reference rates, including the Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates in UK and the Alternative Reference Rates Committee in US, published their work plans and expected milestones for 2020 to facilitate preparation by the market participants. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee in US is developing a set of best practices for the industry to help support the transition away from LIBOR, in addition to a practical implementation checklist for the adoption of secured overnight financing rate. In parallel, these organizations as well as other industry bodies such as ISDA are working toward developing fallback provisions for different types of products and market conventions in using alternative reference rates.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Alternative Reference Rates, Interest Rate Benchmarks, LIBOR, COVID-19, Fallback Provisions, Risk-Free Rates, HIBOR, Benchmark Reforms, HKMA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.