HKMA published the results of a survey intended to assess progress of banking sector in preparing for the transition to alternative reference rates. The survey on the interest rate benchmark reforms in Hong Kong was launched in November 2019. Results of the survey show that nearly one-third of London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)-linked assets and liabilities and almost half of the derivatives contracts referencing LIBOR would mature after the end of 2021 and do not have adequate fallback provisions. Overall, the derivatives contracts referencing LIBOR amounted to HKD 35 trillion in notional value at the end of September 2019.
The survey indicates that new issuance and trading volume of products referencing alternative reference rates continued to increase. In Hong Kong, the working group on alternative reference rates, formed under the Treasury Markets Association, has been following up on issues that need to be addressed locally. The Treasury Markets Association also developed a dedicated web page containing a collection of useful information on benchmark reform and transition to alternative reference rates. HKMA, in consultation with the Treasury Markets Association, will consider providing more assistance to the banking industry in overcoming the following identified challenges:
- No standard and consistent fallback language existed in the industry for adoption by authorized institutions and other market participants in their existing contracts referencing LIBOR.
- The liquidity for products referencing alternative reference rates was found to be comparatively low.
- No well-established term structure was available for alternative reference rates.
- Limited guidance was available to assist smaller institutions in preparing for the transition.
- Authorized institutions needed to implement significant changes to their information technology systems, internal models, and processes within a short timeframe to cater for the transition to alternative reference rates.
- Certain types of financial contracts referencing LIBOR were difficult, if not impossible, for authorized institutions to renegotiate with their customers or counterparties.
- Authorized Institutions might face conduct risk when dealing with their customers along the transition to alternative reference rates.
- Awareness of the benchmark reform and the need for transition to alternative reference rates were comparatively low among non-authorized institutions customers and counterparties.
- It was unclear whether and, if so, how the transition to alternative reference rates would affect authorized institutions in respect of taxation, accounting, and regulatory framework.
- The status of Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (HIBOR) vis-à-vis Hong Kong Dollar Overnight Index Average (HONIA) as the local interest rate benchmark over a longer term was uncertain.
Outside of Hong Kong, FCA had issued a statement, in March, highlighting that the central assumption that firms cannot rely on LIBOR being published after the end of 2021 did not change, notwithstanding the COVID-19 outbreak. Certain organizations leading the transition to alternative reference rates, including the Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates in UK and the Alternative Reference Rates Committee in US, published their work plans and expected milestones for 2020 to facilitate preparation by the market participants. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee in US is developing a set of best practices for the industry to help support the transition away from LIBOR, in addition to a practical implementation checklist for the adoption of secured overnight financing rate. In parallel, these organizations as well as other industry bodies such as ISDA are working toward developing fallback provisions for different types of products and market conventions in using alternative reference rates.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Alternative Reference Rates, Interest Rate Benchmarks, LIBOR, COVID-19, Fallback Provisions, Risk-Free Rates, HIBOR, Benchmark Reforms, HKMA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
EC adopted a package that includes the digital finance and retail payments strategies and the legislative proposals for regulatory frameworks on crypto-assets and digital operational resilience.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/22) on proposals for regulations amending the securitization framework of EU, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
MAS published amendments to Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements for reporting banks incorporated in Singapore.
FCA announced that it will move firms to RegData from Gabriel in the coming months in stages, based on the reporting requirements of firms.
ISDA issued a letter to regulators to flag that it now expects the supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) Fallbacks Protocol to be effective around mid- to late-January 2021.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.