FSI published a brief report providing a non-exhaustive summary of the regulatory measures announced by insurance authorities to achieve four objectives amid COVID-19 pandemic. These objectives are preserving capital adequacy of insurers, mitigating excessive procyclical investment behavior of insurers, providing temporary relief from non-essential regulatory and supervisory requirements, and preserving the continuity of insurance coverage.
The far-reaching impact of COVID-19 calls for sustained vigilance on the part of supervisors and insurers. The FSI brief highlights that many insurance authorities have responded mainly by taking measures to provide operational relief to insurers from regulatory and supervisory requirements. Such measures, which will help insurers to enhance risk monitoring of their COVID-19 financial exposures, include:
- Extending deadlines to submit regular supervisory reports
- Allowing submission of pro-forma unaudited financial reports (Guernsey, Jersey, Tunisia)
- Postponing public consultation of new or revised regulatory or supervisory measures (Canada, Dubai, EIOPA, Malaysia, Peru, Singapore, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom)
Additionally, some authorities have set out expectations for insurers to conserve capital through prudent exercise of dividend and variable remuneration policies. The brief highlights that capital-related measures should relieve supervisory pressure and reduce the tendency of insurers to manage their investments procyclically. These measures include extending the supervisory intervention ladder, triggering the countercyclical lever, and recalibrating capital requirements. Other capital-related measures in response to COVID-19 include the following:
- Allowing loans or premium payment deferrals not to increase capital requirements (Canada, South Africa)
- Adjustment to capital requirements for interest rate risk (Canada, Malaysia)
- Favorable consideration of requests for application of transitional measures on technical provisions under Solvency II (Germany, Poland, United Kingdom)
The extraordinary regulatory measures to provide operational relief to insurers and preserve the continuity of insurance services should be reviewed constantly. A well-designed solvency framework should stand the test of time and should not require frequent ad hoc adjustments that may go against the intended policy objective of withstanding extreme events. Care should be taken to avoid morally hazardous behavior among insurers that could encourage them to expect regulatory relief when the next crisis arrives. As we look toward the post-pandemic phase, the extraordinary measures that are currently warranted will need to be unwound. These recent actions by supervisors and insurers may have long-lasting implications for the industry. Their potential effect on the industry’s reputation and trustworthiness should be carefully considered. An exit strategy that balances sound risk management practices with the need to treat customers fairly will become necessary for insurers and supervisors.
Keywords: International, Insurance, COVID-19, Solvency II, Reporting, Deadline Extension, Capital Requirements, Volatility Adjustment, FSI
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.