FSI published a brief report providing a non-exhaustive summary of the regulatory measures announced by insurance authorities to achieve four objectives amid COVID-19 pandemic. These objectives are preserving capital adequacy of insurers, mitigating excessive procyclical investment behavior of insurers, providing temporary relief from non-essential regulatory and supervisory requirements, and preserving the continuity of insurance coverage.
The far-reaching impact of COVID-19 calls for sustained vigilance on the part of supervisors and insurers. The FSI brief highlights that many insurance authorities have responded mainly by taking measures to provide operational relief to insurers from regulatory and supervisory requirements. Such measures, which will help insurers to enhance risk monitoring of their COVID-19 financial exposures, include:
- Extending deadlines to submit regular supervisory reports
- Allowing submission of pro-forma unaudited financial reports (Guernsey, Jersey, Tunisia)
- Postponing public consultation of new or revised regulatory or supervisory measures (Canada, Dubai, EIOPA, Malaysia, Peru, Singapore, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom)
Additionally, some authorities have set out expectations for insurers to conserve capital through prudent exercise of dividend and variable remuneration policies. The brief highlights that capital-related measures should relieve supervisory pressure and reduce the tendency of insurers to manage their investments procyclically. These measures include extending the supervisory intervention ladder, triggering the countercyclical lever, and recalibrating capital requirements. Other capital-related measures in response to COVID-19 include the following:
- Allowing loans or premium payment deferrals not to increase capital requirements (Canada, South Africa)
- Adjustment to capital requirements for interest rate risk (Canada, Malaysia)
- Favorable consideration of requests for application of transitional measures on technical provisions under Solvency II (Germany, Poland, United Kingdom)
The extraordinary regulatory measures to provide operational relief to insurers and preserve the continuity of insurance services should be reviewed constantly. A well-designed solvency framework should stand the test of time and should not require frequent ad hoc adjustments that may go against the intended policy objective of withstanding extreme events. Care should be taken to avoid morally hazardous behavior among insurers that could encourage them to expect regulatory relief when the next crisis arrives. As we look toward the post-pandemic phase, the extraordinary measures that are currently warranted will need to be unwound. These recent actions by supervisors and insurers may have long-lasting implications for the industry. Their potential effect on the industry’s reputation and trustworthiness should be carefully considered. An exit strategy that balances sound risk management practices with the need to treat customers fairly will become necessary for insurers and supervisors.
Keywords: International, Insurance, COVID-19, Solvency II, Reporting, Deadline Extension, Capital Requirements, Volatility Adjustment, FSI
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).