ESRB published an occasional paper that shows results from the ESRB surveys of the responses of banks and insurance companies to stress tests. The paper describes the surveys and their insights regarding potential adverse feedback loops. The paper does not necessarily characterize current systemic risks, but rather elucidates the value of macro-prudential surveys and discusses the methodological issues that arise in their implementation.
The existing stress tests do not capture feedback loops between individual institutions and the financial system. To identify feedback loops, ESRB has developed macro-prudential surveys that ask banks and insurers how they would behave in a macroeconomic stress scenario. In a pilot application of these surveys, the evidence of herding behavior in the banking sector was noted, particularly concerning credit retrenchment. Results showed that the consequences can be large, potentially undoing the initial effects of banks’ remedial actions by worsening their solvency position. In contrast, insurers’ responses to the survey provided little evidence of herding in response to macroeconomic stress.
These results highlighted the usefulness of macro-prudential surveys in identifying feedback loops. By analyzing survey responses, macro-prudential policymakers can identify systemic risks arising from herding behavior during periods of financial stress. The surveys, therefore, provide a macro-prudential overlay to the large-scale micro-prudential stress tests that have become a cornerstone of the post-crisis financial supervision.
Related Link: Occasional Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Stress Testing, Financial Stability, Macro-prudential Survey, Systemic Risk, ESRB
Previous ArticleOSFI Finalizes Guidelines on CAR and Leverage Requirements
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.