General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
April 18, 2018

Ed Sibley, Deputy Governor (Prudential Regulation) of the Central Bank of Ireland, addressed the DCU Brexit Institute in Dublin on April 12, 2018. He discussed the potential impact of Brexit on the future regulatory framework in Europe and on the financial services firms in Ireland, including those seeking to relocate to Ireland. He also presented the approach of the Central Bank of Ireland toward Brexit and examined how Brexit can affect the regulatory landscape in Europe.

Mr. Sibley welcomed the recent announcement on transitional arrangements for Brexit and emphasized that the arrangements are still, ultimately, dependent on a political agreement on the terms of the UK's withdrawal from the EU. The different incentives and backstops in place in the UK compared to the EU27, should the transitional arrangements not be ratified, result in the UK and EU27 regulatory authorities having to take somewhat different approaches. Therefore, "our approach has to recognize that it is still plausible that there will be a 'hard Brexit' less than year from now. This approach is shared by our colleagues across Europe. As Dr. Andreas Dombret of the Bundesbank recently remarked in a speech here in Dublin, there is 'no alternative to timely preparation, and to preparing for the worst-case scenario of a hard Brexit.' " He also highlighted that the likely loss of passporting rights between the UK and EU27 presents a material risk for Irish firms that depend on a European passport for the cross-border provision of financial services into the UK; this may affect competition and product availability for sectors in Ireland, with inevitable knock-on implications for consumers. In this context, he outlined the impact of Brexit on banks, insurance firms, and asset managers.

With respect to the Irish central bank's approach to Brexit, Mr. Sibley said that it is "one of our highest priorities and involves teams working across every area of the Central Bank. ... We are also having to now de-prioritise and defer other less critical work to accommodate our work on Brexit." Ireland is active internationally to ensure that the risk of divergence between EU jurisdictions in how they handle relocations from the UK is mitigated. To address the concern of regulatory divergences and the risk of regulator arbitrage between EU member states, the Central Bank has long been engaging closely with ECB, across the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and ESAs, to agree Europe-wide approaches to the key policy and supervisory issues, stances, and decisions that have arisen from Brexit. For example, the Bank worked closely and actively, as part of the SSM, to develop a set of guidelines on this matter. ECB's stance is reflected in comments by Sabine Lautenschläger of the ECB's Executive Board when she stated that "the euro entity should not be an empty shell where the credit risk stays in the euro area, and all of the market risks are booked and governed and managed outside of the euro area." The result is that much of the heat is now gone out of the regulatory arbitrage issue. In the short-term, the UK government is working to integrate the current body of EU financial services law into domestic UK law. In the medium-to-longer-term, however, the position is less certain, he said, referring to the not-yet-final withdrawal agreement. As such, a risk of material divergence between the EU and UK regulatory frameworks is one which must occupy some time as part of the wider Brexit preparations.

Divergence in the future might be problematic, as access to EU markets for financial services is based on the concept of equivalence, or the idea that the firms seeking access to the Single Market from outside the EU have broadly comparable regulatory requirements as those present in the EU. A materially divergent future UK regime would place any relationship based on equivalence in doubt, especially as equivalence assessments require an update periodically and there is no guarantee of the outcome of future assessments. This is clearly less than ideal in terms of building a long-term, mutually-beneficial framework of access between UK and EU financial markets. From regulatory perspective, it is desirable, given the size and role of London as a financial center, that some form of sustainable link between the EU and the UK is found. Additionally, following Brexit, there will be a loss of experience and expertise when UK regulators are no longer sitting at the table; this is something that "we need to be mindful of, particularly in Ireland." "London's role as the pre-eminent financial center in Europe results in more than a hub for trading and finance, but also a hub for the regulation of those activities. The loss of this voice is to be mourned. It is important that the EU27 tries to fill any gaps in regulatory expertise where possible."


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, Ireland, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Brexit, Passporting Regime, Withdrawal Agreement, Regulatory Arbitrage, BIS, Central Bank of Ireland

Related Insights

BCBS Finds Liquidity Risk Management Principles Remain Fit for Purpose

BCBS completed a review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The review confirmed that the principles remain fit for purpose.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Urges Local Banks to Start Working on FRTB Implementation

HKMA announced that it plans to issue a consultation paper on the new market risk standard in the second quarter of 2019.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines for High-Risk Exposures Under CRR

EBA published the final guidelines on the specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines are intended to facilitate a higher degree of comparability in terms of the current practices in identifying high-risk exposures.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

MAS Guidelines on Risk Mitigation Requirements for OTC Derivatives

MAS published guidelines on risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2473