ECB published an opinion (CON/2019/16) on participation in the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM). The opinion was issued in response to a request from the Bulgarian Minister of Finance for an opinion on a draft law amending and supplementing the Law on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, the Law on Bulgarian National Bank (BNB), and the Law on the bank deposit guarantee (draft law). The draft law introduces provisions that the consulting authority considers necessary in relation to the application of SRM Regulation (EU Regulation 806/2014) in Bulgaria.
ECB understands that, under the existing law, BNB is already competent to apply both the bridge institution tool and the asset separation tool. BNB is the competent resolution authority to decide on a transfer to a bridge institution or an asset management vehicle of instruments of ownership, assets, rights, and liabilities. BNB is also competent to approve the operation of a bridge bank, a bridge financial holding company, or an asset management vehicle, upon proposal of the Bulgarian Deposit Insurance Fund (BDIF), while the capital of those entities is provided by the Bank Resolution Fund (BRF). The proposed transfer, to BNB, of the existing competences of the BDIF regarding the establishment and incorporation of bridge institutions and asset management vehicles does not confer genuinely new tasks on BNB. Rather, BNB’s proposed new administrative competences in relation to the management of the BRF complement the existing resolution tasks of BNB. The draft law specifies certain new administrative competences that BNB would exercise when carrying out its tasks as a resolution authority.
ECB understands that BNB will manage, but not own, the BRF. The role of a resolution fund that is managed within a central bank must remain consistent under all circumstances with the prohibition on monetary financing under Article 123 of the Treaty, as supplemented by Council Regulation (EC) No 3603/9326, which prohibits, inter alia, any financing by a central bank of the public sector’s obligations vis-à-vis third parties. While administrative resolution tasks may be considered to be central banking tasks, the discharge of these tasks by central banks may not extend to the financing of resolution funds or other financial arrangements related to resolution proceedings, as these are governmental tasks. Where a resolution fund established within a central bank holds capital of a bridge institution or an asset management vehicle, it should be clarified, for the avoidance of doubt, that the central bank will not employ its resources, other than those collected in the resolution fund, to assume or finance any obligation of these entities.
ECB notes that the BNB, the members of the BNB Governing Council, and the BNB staff are not held liable for acts or omissions in the course of discharging their duties under the Law on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, unless they acted intentionally. ECB understands that this provision applies also in relation to the draft law and the BNB’s tasks of managing the BRF and acting as the depository of the Investment Firm Resolution Fund (IFRF).
Related Link: ECB Opinion (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, Bulgaria, Banking, SRMR, Recovery and Resolution, CON/2019/16, Opinion, SRB, BNB, ECB
Previous ArticleBoE Publishes Open Letter on Financial Risks from Climate Change
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).