FSI published a brief that examines the operational resilience initiatives of financial-sector authorities, in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. The brief focuses on examples of business continuity guidance issued by authorities in response to COVID-19, including updates to the existing guidance and the incorporation of pandemic scenarios into testing operational resilience. The brief emphasizes that pandemics may have unique elements that financial institutions need to incorporate in the scenarios to test their operational resilience.
Supervisory discussions at the international level have recently shifted toward achieving operational resilience more broadly. BoE is the first national authority to have issued a consultation on its operational resilience expectations. BoE defines operational resilience as the ability of firms and the financial sector to prevent, adapt, respond to, recover from, and learn from operational disruptions. The objective of addressing operational resilience of financial institutions to IT outages and cyber attacks has clearly motivated the BoE consultation as well as the international supervisory discussions. However, as seen in the disruption that COVID-19 outbreak has caused in recent weeks, financial institutions need to review and ensure that their operational resilience procedures are also fit for purpose during pandemics.
As shown by the recent spate of supervisory guidance in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, pandemics may have unique elements that financial institutions need to incorporate in the scenarios to test their operational resilience. International efforts to come up with operational resilience standards should take into account these unique elements, including the following:
- Critical or essential employees—It is important to identify the critical functions and employees who support important business services as well as to ensure employee safety. Financial institutions should ensure that employees can safely resume their duties (remotely, if necessary) so that business services can recover as quickly as possible.
- IT infrastructure—Financial institutions should ensure that their IT infrastructure can support a sharp increase in usage and take steps to safeguard information security.
- Third-party service providers—Financial institutions should ensure that their external service providers and/or critical suppliers are taking adequate measures and are sufficiently prepared for a scenario in which there will be heavy reliance on their services.
- Cyber resilience—Financial institutions’ cyber resilience processes should remain vigilant to identify and protect vulnerable systems. These processes should be able to detect and respond to cyber attacks and help an institution recover from them.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Business Continuity, Operational Risk, Cyber Risk, Third-Party Arrangements, Operational Resilience, BoE, BIS, FSI
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).