FSI published a brief that examines the operational resilience initiatives of financial-sector authorities, in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. The brief focuses on examples of business continuity guidance issued by authorities in response to COVID-19, including updates to the existing guidance and the incorporation of pandemic scenarios into testing operational resilience. The brief emphasizes that pandemics may have unique elements that financial institutions need to incorporate in the scenarios to test their operational resilience.
Supervisory discussions at the international level have recently shifted toward achieving operational resilience more broadly. BoE is the first national authority to have issued a consultation on its operational resilience expectations. BoE defines operational resilience as the ability of firms and the financial sector to prevent, adapt, respond to, recover from, and learn from operational disruptions. The objective of addressing operational resilience of financial institutions to IT outages and cyber attacks has clearly motivated the BoE consultation as well as the international supervisory discussions. However, as seen in the disruption that COVID-19 outbreak has caused in recent weeks, financial institutions need to review and ensure that their operational resilience procedures are also fit for purpose during pandemics.
As shown by the recent spate of supervisory guidance in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, pandemics may have unique elements that financial institutions need to incorporate in the scenarios to test their operational resilience. International efforts to come up with operational resilience standards should take into account these unique elements, including the following:
- Critical or essential employees—It is important to identify the critical functions and employees who support important business services as well as to ensure employee safety. Financial institutions should ensure that employees can safely resume their duties (remotely, if necessary) so that business services can recover as quickly as possible.
- IT infrastructure—Financial institutions should ensure that their IT infrastructure can support a sharp increase in usage and take steps to safeguard information security.
- Third-party service providers—Financial institutions should ensure that their external service providers and/or critical suppliers are taking adequate measures and are sufficiently prepared for a scenario in which there will be heavy reliance on their services.
- Cyber resilience—Financial institutions’ cyber resilience processes should remain vigilant to identify and protect vulnerable systems. These processes should be able to detect and respond to cyber attacks and help an institution recover from them.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Business Continuity, Operational Risk, Cyber Risk, Third-Party Arrangements, Operational Resilience, BoE, BIS, FSI
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.