Featured Product

    FSI Brief Examines Regulatory Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic

    April 15, 2020

    FSI published a brief on regulatory responses, within the global financial system, to the COVID-19 pandemic. The brief takes stock of the types of financial measures that have been implemented and the rationale for implementation of these measures, along with their pros and cons. It addresses these aspects of policy response based on a simple framework and a set of principles that can guide the assessment. The brief explains that regulatory policy responses should seek to support economic activity while preserving soundness of the financial system while ensuring transparency.

    Since the start of the COVID-19 crisis, prudential and related authorities have implemented a number of measures to support the supply of credit to the economy. The authors highlight that the objectives of financial policies should influence the type and extent of the adjustments. A solid and sound financial system is a prerequisite for sustainable growth. Asymmetric policies that simply ease standards in bad times but do not tighten them in good times could generate excessive risk-taking in the long run. This suggests three principles that could guide the assessment of the adjustments:

    • The adjustments should be effective in supporting economic activity. This should apply at least to the crisis period, and preferably even beyond, when establishing the basis for a solid recovery.
    • The adjustments should preserve the health of the banking (financial) system. Banks should remain sufficiently well-capitalized, liquid, and profitable to underpin sustainable growth.
    • The adjustments should not undermine the long-run credibility of financial policies. Credibility is hard to gain and easy to lose. Compromising the policies excessively in the short run can create serious long-term damage. From this perspective, adjustments should be temporary. Transparency is key in meeting this principle.

    The authors have highlighted that the recommendation for banks to make full use of capital and liquidity buffers should go hand in hand with restrictions on dividends and bonuses and clarity concerning the process for rebuilding them. Flexibility in loan classification criteria for prudential and accounting purposes should be complemented with sufficient disclosure on the criteria banks use to assess creditworthiness. The publication of detailed guidance on the application of expected loss provisioning rules, combined with sensible transitional arrangements, may constitute a balanced approach to mitigating the unintended effects of the new accounting standards.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Accounting, COVID-19, Liquidity Buffer, Transparency, Disclosures, Basel III, Regulatory Capital, Expected Credit Loss, IFRS 9, FSI, BIS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Statement on Application of Matching Adjustment Amid Crisis

    PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Provides Clarity on Implementation of Certain COVID-19 Policies

    EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Consults on Revision of Network and Information Systems Directive

    EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Statement on LIBOR Transition and PRA Resolution-Related Rules

    PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Updates to Pillar 2A Capital Framework in UK

    PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.

    July 06, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Report Examines Progress on Adoption of Basel III Framework

    BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.

    July 06, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Proposes Guidance to Further Support Consumer Credit Customers

    FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ACPR Publishes Draft of Taxonomy RAN 1.4.0 for Solvency II Reporting

    ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.

    July 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Amends Guidelines on Sound Management of AML/CFT Risks

    BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).

    July 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5445