BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks. The reports provide a conceptual foundation for the next phase of the Basel Committee work to identify potential gaps in the Basel Framework and consider measures to address them. The key finding of the analyses is that the drivers of climate risk can be captured in traditional financial risk categories, but additional progress is needed to better estimate these risks. As key challenges are addressed, the ability to estimate and effectively mitigate climate-related financial risks will improve.
The report on drivers and transmission channels of climate risks explores how climate-related risks arise and affect both banks and the banking system via micro- and macro-economic transmission channels. The report notes that economic and financial market impact of climate-related risks can vary based on geography, sector, and economic and financial system development. The report concludes with two recommendations for areas of focus in the future public, private, and academic work:
- Since the impact of climate risk drivers can be observed through traditional risk categories (such as credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and reputational risk), consideration could be given to the way these risks can be addressed in the existing Basel framework. Part of BCBS' near-term work on climate change would be to identify gaps in the Basel framework, in terms of inadequate consideration of climate-related financial risks. This mapping exercise would be comprehensive and could act as a conceptual foundation for the future work of BCBS in exploring possible measures to address the identified gaps.
- Existence of research and accompanying data that explore how climate risks feed into the traditional risks is limited. A better understanding of risk drivers and their transmission channels, across all risk types, would be gained from further research. Research would also benefit from more granular information that is often privately held—for example, more granular borrower data for credit risks.
The report on measurement methodologies provides an overview of conceptual issues related to the measurement of climate-related financial risks and describes current and emerging practices of banks and supervisors in this area. The report highlights the following key findings:
- Climate-related financial risks entail unique features, which means that sufficiently granular data and forward-looking measurement methodologies are needed to address them.
- To date, measurement of climate-related financial risks has centered on mapping near-term transition risk drivers into bank exposures. Credit risk measurement has attracted the most effort, with a lesser focus on other risk categories. Initial scenario analyses and stress tests have in many cases focused on selected portfolios, or exposures for transition risks, and selected hazards for physical risks.
- Key areas for further analysis relate to gaps in data and risk classification, as well as methodologies to address uncertainties associated with the nature of climate change and the potentially longer time horizon for risks to manifest.
Keywords: International, Banking, ESG, Basel, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Data Gaps, Climate Change Risk, Liquidity Risk, Scenario Analysis, BCBS
Previous ArticleOSFI Proposes to Enhance Assurance Expectations for Basel Returns
Next ArticleFCA Sets Out Work Priorities for 2021-22
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.