PRA published a letter to CEOs of insurance firms in run-off, reminding them that they should closely consider the supervisory statement SS4/14 on capital extractions by run-off firms within the general insurance sector when preparing a request for capital extraction for submission to PRA. The SS4/14 sets out the PRA expectations of firms, along with its approach to reviewing the capital extraction requests. This letter seeks to provide further clarity on such expectations and is not intended to supersede SS4/14.
Firms in run-off have limited ability to generate new capital. PRA expects firms to be prudent and ensure that policyholders would maintain an adequate level of protection following any suggested capital extraction. PRA expects firms to demonstrate clearly in their application how the board has satisfied itself that the request is appropriate and meets the expectations in SS4/14. The letter also includes examples of the types of information expected to accompany a capital extraction request such as an analysis of the underlying exposures and an assessment of the expected duration of run-off; a Standard Formula Appropriateness assessment; and a set of robust stress tests that demonstrate the resilience of the capital position post extraction.
PRA frequently reviews capital extraction requests from insurance firms in run-off. During the last two years, it has been observed that the quality of the accompanying information for some of these requests has been inadequate. Particular areas where firms are typically falling short against the PRA expectations are in the provision of information related to stress tests and reserving. This inevitably leads to delays in the PRA assessment and an inefficient use of resources for both, PRA and the firms.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Capital Extraction, Run-off, SS4/14, Stress Testing, PRA
Previous ArticleFHFA Order on Stress Testing Result Reporting by Regulated Entities
APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
EC adopted a package that includes the digital finance and retail payments strategies and the legislative proposals for regulatory frameworks on crypto-assets and digital operational resilience.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/22) on proposals for regulations amending the securitization framework of EU, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
MAS published amendments to Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements for reporting banks incorporated in Singapore.
FCA announced that it will move firms to RegData from Gabriel in the coming months in stages, based on the reporting requirements of firms.
ISDA issued a letter to regulators to flag that it now expects the supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) Fallbacks Protocol to be effective around mid- to late-January 2021.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.