FSI of BIS published a paper on the identification and measurement of non-performing assets (NPAs). The paper focuses on the role that prudential regulation and supervision can play in facilitating the prompt identification and measurement of NPAs, by taking stock of cross-country practices.
The paper takes stock of NPA identification and measurement practices across select jurisdictions and identifies a number of regulatory and supervisory policy considerations that may be useful to supervisory authorities. It first outlines applicable accounting standards on NPA identification and measurement and summarizes the recent BCBS guidance on the prudential treatment of problem assets. Then, it discusses the key takeaways of the FSI survey on NPA identification and measurement practices across sampled jurisdictions. Next, the paper sets out policy options that supervisors may consider to enhance their NPA identification and measurement process. Finally, the paper provides brief concluding remarks, followed by an Annex that provides detailed information on NPA identification and measurement in the sampled countries.
The study reveals considerable differences across jurisdictions in the applicable accounting standards, which are exacerbated by divergent prudential frameworks that govern NPA identification and measurement. These differences make it difficult to make meaningful comparisons—both within and across jurisdictions—on key asset quality metrics, which are often a driver of a bank’s overall financial condition and operating performance.
Keywords: International, Banking, Accounting, NPLs, Identification and Measurement, Impairment, ECL, CECL, NPA, FSI, BIS
Previous ArticleDietrich Domanski of FSB Offers Updates on Planned Work for 2018
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.