FSI of BIS published a paper on the identification and measurement of non-performing assets (NPAs). The paper focuses on the role that prudential regulation and supervision can play in facilitating the prompt identification and measurement of NPAs, by taking stock of cross-country practices.
The paper takes stock of NPA identification and measurement practices across select jurisdictions and identifies a number of regulatory and supervisory policy considerations that may be useful to supervisory authorities. It first outlines applicable accounting standards on NPA identification and measurement and summarizes the recent BCBS guidance on the prudential treatment of problem assets. Then, it discusses the key takeaways of the FSI survey on NPA identification and measurement practices across sampled jurisdictions. Next, the paper sets out policy options that supervisors may consider to enhance their NPA identification and measurement process. Finally, the paper provides brief concluding remarks, followed by an Annex that provides detailed information on NPA identification and measurement in the sampled countries.
The study reveals considerable differences across jurisdictions in the applicable accounting standards, which are exacerbated by divergent prudential frameworks that govern NPA identification and measurement. These differences make it difficult to make meaningful comparisons—both within and across jurisdictions—on key asset quality metrics, which are often a driver of a bank’s overall financial condition and operating performance.
Keywords: International, Banking, Accounting, NPLs, Identification and Measurement, Impairment, ECL, CECL, NPA, FSI, BIS
Previous ArticleDietrich Domanski of FSB Offers Updates on Planned Work for 2018
MAS and Temasek jointly released a report to mark the successful conclusion of the fifth and final phase of Project Ubin, which focused on building a blockchain-based multi-currency payments network prototype.
EBA published phase 2 of the technical package on the reporting framework 2.10, providing the technical tools and specifications for implementation of EBA reporting requirements.
APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
PRA updated the statement that provides guidance to regulated firms on implementation of the EBA guidelines on reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures applied in response to the COVID-19 crisis.
EBA updated the 2019 list of closely correlated currencies that was originally published in December 2013.
FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant insurance companies, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional year to implement the Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 on targeted improvements to accounting for long-duration insurance contracts, or LDTI (Topic 944).
APRA updated the regulatory approach for loans subject to repayment deferrals amid the COVID-19 crisis.
BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition.
IAIS published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition from an insurance perspective.
ESMA updated the reporting manual on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).