General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
April 10, 2018

Danièle Nouy of ECB spoke at the International Conference on Banks’ Risk Appetite Frameworks in Ljubljana. She defined the risk appetite framework and explained how to judge the quality of risk appetite frameworks. Then, she discussed the current state-of-play regarding the risk appetite frameworks of banks and discusses the improvements banks need to make in their frameworks.

Ms. Nouy explains that the risk appetite frameworks should be comprehensive, effectively governed, consistently used, and fully integrated into strategic decision making. After explaining the expectations from banks, she moved on to highlight the progress made by banks. She added that the risk appetite frameworks of banks are now better structured and subject to clearer governance. For instance, most banks have clarified the role of the relevant stakeholders involved in the risk appetite framework. Moreover, in many banks, internal auditors have reviewed the effectiveness of risk appetite frameworks. Many of these frameworks cover a broader set of risks than before. Most banks go beyond the regulatory minimum to define metrics that are more suited to their business models. Ms. Nouy believes that, despite this progress, banks need to improve their frameworks and then points out four things that banks need to work on:

  • Non-financial risks should be better covered (and not be completely left out). If a bank cannot put concrete numbers to these risks, it should at least use qualitative statements.
  • The governance of risk appetite frameworks must be further improved. Boards need to play a bigger role in the definition and review of risk appetite frameworks.
  • Banks must use risk appetite limits as a tool to monitor their risk profiles, keep risks in check, and set the right incentives for the organization.
  • Banks need to embed risk appetite frameworks in their strategic processes.

She emphasizes that banks need to take a holistic approach to risk culture and risk management, including risk appetite. “These things need to be perfectly attuned. And they need to be in harmony with the rest of the organization—with the business model and with remuneration schemes, among other things. This framework needs to be an integral part of the decision-making process.” She added that most banks do not use risk appetite limits and statements as tools to facilitate discussion at various levels of the organization. They need to change this approach and create better incentives for complying with risk appetite frameworks. “Here, the tone from the top plays a crucial role. It is those at the top who have to promote a sound risk culture—by putting it into practice, by acting as role models. The board and the senior management must define values and set expectations for the risk culture. The board in particular must challenge the senior management and so ensure that each and every strategic decision is based on a sound risk analysis. Moreover, having a sound infrastructure for risk data would make this easier to achieve.”


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Risk Appetite, Risk Management, Governance, ECB

Related Articles

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Publishes Report on Convergence of Supervisory Practices Across EU

EBA published annual report on the convergence of supervisory practices in EU.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

CPMI-IOSCO Publish Update to Level 1 Assessment of PFMI Implementation

CPMI and IOSCO jointly updated the Level 1 Assessment Online Tracker on monitoring of the implementation of the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMI).

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

Agustín Carstens of BIS Speaks About New Role of Central Banks

While speaking at the 20th anniversary conference of the Financial Stability Institute (FSI), Agustín Carstens, the General Manager of BIS, highlighted the need for regulatory actions in light of the continued evolution of financial technology.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement on Group Supervision Under Solvency II

PRA published a policy statement (PS9/19) that provides feedback on responses to the consultation paper CP15/18 and the final supervisory statement SS9/15 (Appendix) on group supervision under Solvency II.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Proposes to Update the Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

PRA is proposing (CP5/19) to update the Pillar 2 capital framework to reflect continued refinements and developments in setting the PRA buffer (Pillar 2B).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement Related to Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published a policy statement (PS8/19) that contains the final policy in the updated supervisory statement SS17/13 on credit risk mitigation (Appendix 1) as well as the statement SS31/15 on Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process or SREP (Appendix 2).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Updates Supplemental Information and Q&A for Form FR Y-14

FED updated the supplemental instructions and the questions and answers (Q&A) document for the information collection on capital assessments and stress testing, which is covered by the reporting form FR Y-14A.

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EC Amends Regulations on Clearing Obligation for Derivative Contracts

EC published the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/396 that supplements the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) regarding the date at which the clearing obligation takes effect for certain types of contracts.

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Sets Prudential Expectations for Crypto-Asset Exposures of Banks

BCBS issued a statement setting out its prudential expectations for bank exposures to crypto-assets and related services, for the jurisdictions that do not prohibit such exposures and services.

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2739