APRA published feedback on the preparations for London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) transition by institutions in Australia. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released this feedback on responses from selected major Australian financial institutions that detailed their respective entities' preparation for the end of London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). This initiative is supported by both APRA and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). The feedback includes general assessment of the transition preparations, related recommendations, and a plan for ongoing engagement on these issues. The regulators recognize that disruptions from the COVID-19 outbreak may affect the timing of some aspects of the transition plans of institutions.
The CEOs of selected major Australian financial institutions received a letter from regulators in May 2019, to which the institutions had responded in July 2019, providing the regulators with information on the transition preparations. Institutions that responded to the letter have been separately provided with specific feedback from ASIC and APRA on their transition preparations. The feedback published now by APRA highlights the need for all institutions to plan for LIBOR transition, the aspects to consider in transition, and the importance of addressing the related issues early. To ensure a smooth transition, it is crucial that institutions in Australia are well-prepared. The country's regulators encourage all financial and corporate institutions in Australia to read the feedback, consider the implications of transition for their own situation, and plan accordingly for the end of LIBOR.
The feedback provides some examples of what APRA and ASIC consider to be standards of "best practice" for prudential and conduct risk mitigation measures. Respondents that are better prepared for LIBOR transition demonstrated these standards. All institutions should consider how these measures may be relevant to their LIBOR transition planning, taking into account the nature, scale, and complexity of their activities and the extent of their LIBOR exposures. The following are the some of the observed best practices:
- Formalize a transition program that identifies risks, mitigation strategies, and timelines
- Conduct a comprehensive assessment of how LIBOR affects an institution’s business and quantify LIBOR-related risks
- Focus on client outreach and communication programs to ensure clients are aware of the transition risks
- Participate in industry forums and keep abreast of market developments and coordinated actions being taken within the industry
- Seek legal advice on contract amendment and fall-back provisions
- Assess readiness of IT systems and infrastructure and ensure they can process contracts that reference overnight rates
- Plan for both base and alternative scenarios, including the adoption of various alternative reference rates
- Initiate LIBOR transition training programs for relevant stakeholders, including staff members, Boards and senior management.
- Consider conduct-related issues associated with the transition, including the potential for conflict of interest, fair treatment of clients, and asymmetry of information. ASIC intends to release additional conduct-related information and industry guidance on LIBOR transition in 2020
- Ensure there is adequate due diligence, risk assessment, and contingency planning in relation to third-party service providers in the context of LIBOR transition
In line with initiatives and workstreams of international industry bodies such as IOSCO and the Official Sector Steering Group (OSSG) of FSB, the Australian regulators (APRA, ASIC, and RBA) will continue to speak and engage publicly to increase general awareness of the need to plan for LIBOR transition and to encourage institutions to start the transition early. This engagement aims to mitigate potential stability risks to the wider market by reaching a broad range of institutions to include those that have not yet been engaged on the issues. ASIC and APRA will monitor industry developments and, where appropriate, engage with relevant stakeholders to seek assurance that these outcomes are being adequately addressed.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, Alternative Reference Rates, COVID-19, Risk-Free Rates, COVID-19, Risk Free Rates, Interest Rate Benchmark, RBA, ASIC, APRA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleAPRA Issues Guidance for Capital Management by Banks and Insurers
HM Treasury notified that, after considering all responses, the government intends to bring forward further legislation, when the Parliamentary time allows, to address issues identified in the consultation on supporting the wind-down of critical benchmarks.
EIOPA launched the 2021 stress test for the insurance sector in EU.
UK authorities jointly published the third edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid setting out the planned regulatory initiatives for the next 24 months.
EC is requesting feedback on the proposed Commission Delegated Regulation on the content, methodology, and presentation of information that large financial and non-financial undertakings should disclose about their environmentally sustainable economic activities under the Taxonomy Regulation.
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.
ECB published its response to the targeted EC consultation on the review of the bank crisis management and deposit insurance framework in EU.
BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO (the Committees) are inviting entities that participate in market infrastructures and securities markets through an intermediary as well as non-bank intermediaries to complete voluntary surveys on the use of margin calls.